首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >Vibration Serviceability of Footbridges: Classical vs. Innovative Material Solutions for Deck Slabs
【2h】

Vibration Serviceability of Footbridges: Classical vs. Innovative Material Solutions for Deck Slabs

机译:足桥的振动可用性:甲板板坯的古典与创新材料解决方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this study, the human-induced dynamic performance of modern footbridges equipped with either classical reinforced concrete (RC) or innovative glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite deck slabs were investigated and compared. The numerical studies were carried out for two bridges: a three-span cable-stayed footbridge and a three-span continuous beam structure. Two variants of both bridges were taken into consideration: the footbridges equipped with traditional RC slabs and the structures benefitted with GFRP slabs. The risk of resonance as well as the vibration serviceability and the comfort criteria assessment of the footbridges with different slab materials were assessed. The investigation revealed that the footbridges, both cable-stayed and beam, benefitted with the GFRP slabs had higher fundamental frequency than those with the traditional RC slabs. The footbridges with the GFRP slabs were less exposed to the resonance risk, having fundamental frequencies above the limit of the high risk of resonance. The effect of shifting up the natural frequencies by introducing GFRP slabs was more remarkable for the lightweight beam structure than for the cable-stayed footbridge and resulted in a more significant reduction of the resonance risk. The calculated maximum human-induced accelerations of the footbridges benefitted with the GFRP slabs were meaningfully higher than those obtained for the footbridges with the RC slabs. The study proved that, with the same GFRP slab, meeting vibration serviceability and comfort criteria limits in the case of very lightweight beam structures may be more problematic than for cable-stayed footbridges with more massive structural systems. In the research, particular attention was paid to examining the impact of higher harmonics of the moving pedestrian force on the structures benefitted with the GFRP composite slabs. It occurred that in the case of footbridges, both cable-stayed and beam, equipped with the RC slabs higher harmonics of human force did not play any role in the dynamic performance of structures. However, in the case of the footbridges benefitted with the GFRP slabs, the impact of higher harmonics of the pedestrian force on the dynamic behavior of structures was clearly visible. Higher harmonics excited accelerations comparable to those executed by the first harmonic component. This conclusion is of great importance for footbridges equipped with GFRP slabs. The fundamental frequency may place a footbridge in the low or even negligible risk resonance range and the higher frequencies corresponding to vertical modes may be located above the limit of 5 Hz that ensures avoiding resonance. Nevertheless, the fact that fundamental modes are so responsive to higher harmonics significantly increases the risk of resonance. The amplification of the dynamic response may occur due to frequencies related to second or third harmonics (i.e., being half or a third of the natural frequencies). In such cases, full dynamic analysis of a footbridge at the design stage seems to be of crucial importance.
机译:在这项研究中,研究了具有经典钢筋混凝土(RC)或创新玻璃纤维增​​强聚合物(GFRP)复合甲板板的现代操作系统的人体诱导的动态性能进行了比较。对两座桥进行的数值研究:三跨斜拉的行人桥和三跨连续梁结构。考虑到两座桥梁的两种变体:配备传统RC板的行人桥和与GFRP板坯有益的结构。评估共振的风险以及振动可用性以及具有不同板坯材料的扶手的舒适标准评估。调查显示,缆车持久和梁的脚架,受益于GFRP板的基本频率高于传统RC板的频率较高。具有GFRP板坯的脚架不太暴露于共振风险,具有高于共振风险高的基本频率。通过引入GFRP板坯来改变自然频率的效果对于轻质光束结构比跳高的行人桥更为显着,并且导致谐振风险的更显着降低。所计算的具有GFRP板坯的脚边的脚边的最大人体引起的加速度比具有RC板坯的脚桥所获得的脚边的最大人诱导的加速度。该研究证明,利用相同的GFRP板坯,在非常轻质的梁结构的情况下,在非常轻质的光束结构的情况下满足振动可用性和舒适性标准限制可能比具有更多大规模结构系统的缆绳侧桥更有问题。在该研究中,特别关注检查移动行人力量对受益于GFRP复合板的结构的影响。它发生了这种情况,在足桥的情况下,缆绳和光束都配备了RC板的人力谐波在结构的动态性能下没有发挥作用。然而,在受益于GFRP板坯的余地的情况下,清晰可见的行人力量对行人的动态行为的影响。更高的谐波激发加速度与第一个谐波分量执行的兴奋加速度相当。这一结论对于配备GFRP板坯的人身人员来说非常重要。基本频率可以在低甚至可忽略的风险谐振范围内放置行人桥,并且对应于垂直模式的较高频率可以位于5Hz的极限之上,以确保避免谐振。尽管如此,基本模式对更高次谐波的基本模式显着提高了共振的风险。由于与第二或第三谐波相关的频率(即,自然频率的一半或三分之一),可能发生动态响应的放大。在这种情况下,在设计阶段的行人桥的全动态分析似乎是至关重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号