首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing China)
【2h】

Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing China)

机译:重庆市Yun阳县滑坡敏感性图随机森林模型和频率比模型的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare the random forest (RF) model and the frequency ratio (FR) model for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM), this research selected Yunyang Country as the study area for its frequent natural disasters; especially landslides. A landslide inventory was built by historical records; satellite images; and extensive field surveys. Subsequently; a geospatial database was established based on 987 historical landslides in the study area. Then; all the landslides were randomly divided into two datasets: 70% of them were used as the training dataset and 30% as the test dataset. Furthermore; under five primary conditioning factors (i.e., topography factors; geological factors; environmental factors; human engineering activities; and triggering factors), 22 secondary conditioning factors were selected to form an evaluation factor library for analyzing the landslide susceptibility. On this basis; the RF model training and the FR model mathematical analysis were performed; and the established models were used for the landslide susceptibility simulation in the entire area of Yunyang County. Next; based on the analysis results; the susceptibility maps were divided into five classes: very low; low; medium; high; and very high. In addition; the importance of conditioning factors was ranked and the influence of landslides was explored by using the RF model. The area under the curve (AUC) value of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; precision; accuracy; and recall ratio were used to analyze the predictive ability of the above two LSM models. The results indicated a difference in the performances between the two models. The RF model (AUC = 0.988) performed better than the FR model (AUC = 0.716). Moreover; compared with the FR model; the RF model showed a higher coincidence degree between the areas in the high and the very low susceptibility classes; on the one hand; and the geographical spatial distribution of historical landslides; on the other hand. Therefore; it was concluded that the RF model was more suitable for landslide susceptibility evaluation in Yunyang County; because of its significant model performance; reliability; and stability. The outcome also provided a theoretical basis for application of machine learning techniques (e.g., RF) in landslide prevention; mitigation; and urban planning; so as to deliver an adequate response to the increasing demand for effective and low-cost tools in landslide susceptibility assessments.
机译:为了比较随机森林(RF)模型和频率比(FR)模型进行滑坡敏感性测绘(LSM)的方法,本研究选择Country阳县作为其自然灾害频发的研究区域。特别是滑坡。根据历史记录建立了滑坡清单。卫星图像;和广泛的实地调查。后来;根据研究区域的987个历史滑坡建立了一个地理空间数据库。然后;所有的滑坡都随机分为两个数据集:其中70%被用作训练数据集,而30%被用作测试数据集。此外;根据五个主要条件因素(即地形因素,地质因素,环境因素,人类工程活动和触发因素),选择了22个次要条件因素,以形成评估滑坡敏感性的评估因素库。在此基础上;进行了RF模型训练和FR模型数学分析;并将建立的模型用于yang阳县整个地区的滑坡敏感性分析。下一个;根据分析结果;磁化率图分为五类:非常低;低;中;高;很高此外;使用RF模型对条件因素的重要性进行了排名,并探讨了滑坡的影响。接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)值;精确;准确性;用召回率和召回率来分析以上两种LSM模型的预测能力。结果表明两个模型之间的性能差异。 RF模型(AUC = 0.988)的性能优于FR模型(AUC = 0.716)。此外;与FR模型比较; RF模型显示出高和低磁化率区域之间的重合度更高;一方面;历史滑坡的地理空间分布;另一方面。因此;结论:RF模型更适合云阳县滑坡敏感性评价。由于其出色的模型性能;可靠性;和稳定性。该结果还为机器学习技术(例如RF)在滑坡预防中的应用提供了理论基础;减轻;和城市规划;以便对滑坡敏感性评估中对有效且低成本工具日益增长的需求做出适当的回应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号