首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Phlebiopsis gigantea strains VRA 1835 VRA 1984 and FOC PG 410.3
【2h】

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Phlebiopsis gigantea strains VRA 1835 VRA 1984 and FOC PG 410.3

机译:对活性物质拟竹假单胞菌VRA 1835VRA 1984和FOC PG 410.3农药风险评估的同行评审

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The conclusions of the following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Estonia and co‐rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance strains 1835, 1984 and 410.3 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation ( ) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation ( ) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of strains 1835, 1984 and 410.3 as a fungicide (field use) on conifer forests: pine, spruce, larch. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
机译:报告了报告人成员国爱沙尼亚和共同报告国法国主管当局对1835年,1984年和410.3农药活性物质菌株进行的初始风险评估的同行评审得出的结论。同行评审的背景是委员会(844/2012号实施细则)以及委员会2018/1659号(实施细则)修订的要求。这些结论是根据对1835、1984和410.3菌株在针叶林(松树,云杉,落叶松)上作为杀真菌剂(田间使用)的代表性使用的评估得出的。介绍了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺少信息。确定了问题。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号