首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Kambin’s Triangle Approach versus Traditional Safe Triangle Approach for Percutaneous Transforaminal Epidural Adhesiolysis Using an Inflatable Balloon Catheter: A Pilot Study
【2h】

Kambin’s Triangle Approach versus Traditional Safe Triangle Approach for Percutaneous Transforaminal Epidural Adhesiolysis Using an Inflatable Balloon Catheter: A Pilot Study

机译:Kambin的三角形方法与传统的安全三角形方法使用充气球囊导管经皮经椎间孔硬膜外腔黏膜溶解术的初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Spinal stenosis is a common condition in elderly individuals. Many patients are unresponsive to the conventional treatment. If the transforaminal epidural block does not exert a sufficient treatment effect, percutaneous transforaminal epidural adhesiolysis (PTFA) through the safe-triangle approach using an inflatable balloon catheter can reduce the patients’ pain and improve their functional capacity. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Kambin’s-triangle approach for PTFA using an inflatable balloon catheter and compare this approach to the traditional safe-triangle approach. Thirty patients with chronic unilateral L5 radiculopathy were divided into two groups: the safe-triangle-approach and Kambin’s-triangle-approach groups, with 15 patients each. The success rate of the procedure was assessed. Pain and dysfunction were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry Disability Index, respectively, before the procedure and at 1 and 3 months after the procedure. The success rate of the procedure was high in both the groups, with no significant difference between the groups. The Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly decreased 3 months after the procedure in both the groups, with no significant difference between the groups. For patients in whom the safe-triangle approach for PTFA is difficult, the Kambin’s-triangle approach could be an alternative.
机译:椎管狭窄是老年人的常见病。许多患者对常规治疗无反应。如果经椎间孔硬膜外阻滞不能发挥足够的治疗效果,则通过使用可充气气囊导管的安全三角法经皮经椎间孔硬膜外粘连术(PTFA)可以减轻患者的痛苦并提高他们的功能。我们旨在评估使用充气气球导管的Kambin三角法治疗PTFA的安全性和有效性,并将这种方法与传统的安全三角法进行比较。 30例慢性单侧L5神经根神经病患者分为两组:安全三角法和坎宾三角法,每组15例。评估手术的成功率。分别在手术前和手术后1个月和3个月使用数字评分量表和Oswestry残疾指数评估疼痛和功能障碍。两组的手术成功率均很高,两组之间无显着差异。两组在手术后3个月,数字评分量表和Oswestry残疾指数评分均显着降低,两组之间无显着差异。对于难以使用PTFA的安全三角法的患者,可以使用Kambin三角法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号