首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power Structures
【2h】

Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power Structures

机译:谁推动绿色创新?不同权力结构下闭环供应链的博弈分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As awareness of environmental protection increases worldwide, enterprises have been building their supply chains in ways that conserve natural resources and minimize the creation of pollutants. One of the practical ways to make supply chains more sustainable is for enterprises to utilize green innovation strategies and to increase resource reuse. In this work, we focus on a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) consisting of a manufacturer, a retailer, and a collector. In the investigated CLSC, the manufacturer and the retailer drive the green innovation strategy either individually or simultaneously to boost market demand. In the reverse flow of the CLSC, the collector is responsible for collecting consumers’ used products and transferring them to the manufacturer for remanufacturing. By combining two types of the market leadership and three types of green innovation strategies, we establish six different Stackelberg game models and solve them analytically. Through an extensive comparative analysis, we show who should have market leadership and who should drive the green innovation strategy in the CLSC. Various numerical examples are also given to support our major findings. One of our key findings suggests that the supply chain members must participate in green innovation activities at the same time to achieve a win-win scenario in the CLSC.
机译:随着全球范围内环保意识的增强,企业一直在建立供应链,以节约自然资源并减少污染物的产生。使供应链更具可持续性的一种实际方法是让企业利用绿色创新战略并增加资源再利用。在这项工作中,我们专注于由制造商,零售商和收藏家组成的闭环供应链(CLSC)。在接受调查的CLSC中,制造商和零售商分别或同时推动绿色创新战略,以提高市场需求。在CLSC的反向流程中,收集者负责收集消费者使用过的产品,并将其转移给制造商以进行再制造。通过结合两种类型的市场领导者和三种类型的绿色创新战略,我们建立了六个不同的Stackelberg游戏模型并进行了分析求解。通过广泛的比较分析,我们显示了谁应该拥有市场领导者,谁应该推动CLSC中的绿色创新战略。还提供了各种数值示例来支持我们的主要发现。我们的一项重要发现表明,供应链成员必须同时参与绿色创新活动,才能在CLSC中实现双赢。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号