首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Note: Comparison of Commercial Amies Transport Systems with In-House Amies Medium for Recovery of Neisseria gonorrhoeae
【2h】

Note: Comparison of Commercial Amies Transport Systems with In-House Amies Medium for Recovery of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

机译:注意:商业性Amies运输系统与内部Amies培养基用于回收淋病奈瑟氏菌的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Microbiologists are still encumbered by the variable performance of Amies charcoal transport medium in recovery of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The objective of this study was to evaluate and select a good quality commercial system to replace our in-house preparation. We adsorbed 0.1 ml of a suspension from 30 gonococcal isolates onto each swab type and replaced the swab into the transport medium. We plated the swabs to New York City medium at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. We compared the survival of each isolate in the commercial Amies transport systems with that in our in-house Amies transport medium. The best recovery was observed with Copan transport systems. Some systems are inadequate and unacceptable for culture of gonococci.
机译:微生物学家仍然对Amies炭运输介质在淋病奈瑟氏球菌的恢复中表现不佳感到困惑。这项研究的目的是评估和选择高质量的商业系统来代替我们的内部准备。我们将30种淋球菌分离株中的0.1 ml悬浮液吸附到每种拭子上,并将其替换到运输介质中。我们在0、24、48、72和96小时将拭子接种到纽约市培养基中。我们比较了商业Amies运输系统中每种分离株的存活率和我们内部Amies运输介质中每种分离株的存活率。使用Copan运输系统可观察到最佳恢复。一些系统对于淋球菌的培养是不充分的和不可接受的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号