首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI >Welfare Implications for Hares Lepus timidus hibernicus Taken from the Wild for Licensed Hare Coursing in Ireland
【2h】

Welfare Implications for Hares Lepus timidus hibernicus Taken from the Wild for Licensed Hare Coursing in Ireland

机译:对野兔的福利意义Lepus timidus hibernicus在爱尔兰因野外野兔惊吓而从野外获取

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Hare coursing is a widespread and controversial activity in the Republic of Ireland in which the speed and agility of greyhounds are measured against that of a hare. Every year, several thousands of hares are taken from the wild by coursing clubs under licenses issued by the National Parks and Wildlife Service. While the majority are returned to the wild at the end of the coursing season, no research has been done on the impact of hare coursing on the welfare of individual hares. Despite greyhounds in licensed coursing events being muzzled since 1993, hares may be pinned to the ground by the dogs and killed or so severely injured that they have to be euthanized by a veterinary practitioner. In addition to animal welfare concerns, the recent emergence in Ireland of rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD2) has led to calls for licensed hare coursing to be prohibited on animal welfare, disease control, conservation and ethical grounds. In this paper, publicly available information provided by licensed hare coursing clubs on the number of hares captured, used for coursing events, killed or injured and the percentage returned to the wild, over four coursing seasons is reviewed. A reported 19,402 hares were taken from the wild over the four coursing seasons. Whilst 19,080 hares (98%) were returned to the wild, 75 were killed by greyhounds or had to be euthanized due to their injuries. Policy makers should take animal welfare, disease control, conservation, ethics and public opinion into account and fund independent research where gaps in knowledge are identified.
机译:野兔追赶在爱尔兰共和国是一项广泛而有争议的活动,在其中,猎狗的速度和敏捷性是相对于野兔的速度和敏捷性进行衡量的。每年,在国家公园和野生动物管理局(National Parks and Wildlife Service)颁发的许可下,巡游俱乐部从野外带走了数千只野兔。虽然大多数人在狩猎季节结束时返回野外,但尚未进行关于野兔狩猎对单个野兔福利的影响的研究。尽管自1993年以来,在许可的巡回赛中只猎狗,但野兔可能会被狗钉在地上并被杀死或受重伤,因此必须由兽医对其实施安乐死。除了对动物福利的关注之外,爱尔兰最近出现的兔出血性疾病(RHD2)导致呼吁基于动物福利,疾病控制,保护和道德理由禁止许可的野兔追捕。在本文中,回顾了四个执照季节,持牌野兔考核俱乐部提供的可公开获取的信息,包括捕获的野兔数量,用于野战事件,被杀死或受伤的野兔数量以及返回野外的百分比。在四个狩猎季节中,据报道从野外采集了19,402公顷野兔。虽然将19,080野兔(98%)放归野外,但有75只野狗被灰狗杀死或因受伤而被安乐死。决策者应考虑动物福利,疾病控制,保护,道德和公众舆论,并在发现知识空白的情况下资助独立研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号