首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Based Respiratory-Gated Radiotherapy with Respiratory Guidance System: Analysis of Respiratory Signals and Dosimetric Comparison
【2h】

Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Based Respiratory-Gated Radiotherapy with Respiratory Guidance System: Analysis of Respiratory Signals and Dosimetric Comparison

机译:基于四维计算机断层扫描的基于呼吸导引系统的呼吸门控放射治疗:呼吸信号分析和剂量学比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. To investigate the effectiveness of respiratory guidance system in 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) based respiratory-gated radiation therapy (RGRT) by comparing respiratory signals and dosimetric analysis of treatment plans. Methods. The respiratory amplitude and period of the free, the audio device-guided, and the complex system-guided breathing were evaluated in eleven patients with lung or liver cancers. The dosimetric parameters were assessed by comparing free breathing CT plan and 4DCT-based 30–70% maximal intensity projection (MIP) plan. Results. The use of complex system-guided breathing showed significantly less variation in respiratory amplitude and period compared to the free or audio-guided breathing regarding the root mean square errors (RMSE) of full inspiration (P = 0.031), full expiration (P = 0.007), and period (P = 0.007). The dosimetric parameters including V 5 Gy, V 10 Gy, V 20 Gy, V 30 Gy, V 40 Gy, and V 50 Gy of normal liver or lung in 4DCT MIP plan were superior over free breathing CT plan. Conclusions. The reproducibility and regularity of respiratory amplitude and period were significantly improved with the complex system-guided breathing compared to the free or the audio-guided breathing. In addition, the treatment plan based on the 4D CT-based MIP images acquired with the complex system guided breathing showed better normal tissue sparing than that on the free breathing CT.
机译:目的。通过比较呼吸信号和治疗计划的剂量分析,研究基于4维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)的呼吸门控放射治疗(RGRT)中的呼吸引导系统的有效性。方法。在11名肺癌或肝癌患者中评估了自由呼吸,音频设备引导和复杂系统引导呼吸的呼吸幅度和周期。通过比较自由呼吸CT计划和基于4DCT的30-70%最大强度投影(MIP)计划来评估剂量学参数。结果。就完全吸气的均方根误差(RMSE)(P = 0.031),完全呼气(P = 0.007)而言,使用复杂的系统引导呼吸比自由呼吸或听觉引导呼吸的呼吸幅度和周期变化要小得多)和期间(P = 0.007)。在4DCT MIP计划中,正常肝或肺的剂量参数包括V 5 Gy,V 10 Gy,V 20 Gy,V 30 Gy,V 40 Gy和V 50 Gy优于自由呼吸CT计划。结论。与自由呼吸或声音引导呼吸相比,复杂的系统引导呼吸显着改善了呼吸幅度和周期的再现性和规律性。此外,基于通过复杂系统引导呼吸获得的基于4D CT的MIP图像的治疗计划显示出比自由呼吸CT更好的正常组织保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号