首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Passage of Time Judgments Are Not Duration Judgments: Evidence from a Study Using Experience Sampling Methodology
【2h】

Passage of Time Judgments Are Not Duration Judgments: Evidence from a Study Using Experience Sampling Methodology

机译:时间判断不是持续时间判断:使用经验抽样方法的研究证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study examined relations between passage of time judgments and duration judgments (DJs) in everyday life, in young and elderly people, with an Experience Sampling Method. The DJs were assessed by verbal estimation and interval production measures. The results showed no difference between young and elderly people in judgments of rate of passage of time, a result contrary to the conventional idea that time passes more quickly as we get older. There were also no significant relation between the judgment of passage of time and the judgments of durations. In addition, the significant predictors of individual differences in the judgment of passage of time (emotion states and focus of attention on the current activity) were not predictors of judgment of durations. In sum, passages of time judgments are not related to DJs.
机译:这项研究使用一种经验抽样方法,研究了年轻人和老年人在日常生活中时间判断和持续时间判断(DJ)之间的关系。通过口头评估和间歇性生产措施评估DJ。结果表明,年轻人和老年人在时间流逝率的判断上没有区别,这与传统的观念相反,传统观念认为,随着年龄的增长,时间流逝会更快。时间流逝的判断与持续时间的判断之间也没有显着关系。另外,时间流逝的判断中个体差异的重要预测指标(情绪状态和对当前活动的关注焦点)不是持续时间判断的预测指标。总而言之,时间的判断与DJ无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号