首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Influence of Material Selection on the Marginal Accuracy of CAD/CAM-Fabricated Metal- and All-Ceramic Single Crown Copings
【2h】

Influence of Material Selection on the Marginal Accuracy of CAD/CAM-Fabricated Metal- and All-Ceramic Single Crown Copings

机译:材料选择对CAD / CAM加工的金属陶瓷和全陶瓷单冠涂层的边缘精度的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study evaluated the marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated crown copings from four different materials within the same processing route. Twenty stone replicas of a metallic master die (prepared upper premolar) were scanned and divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 10) was used for a pilot test to determine the design parameters for best marginal accuracy. Group 2 (n = 10) was used to fabricate 10 specimens from the following materials with one identical CAD/CAM system (GAMMA 202, Wissner GmbH, Goettingen, Germany): A = commercially pure (cp) titanium, B = cobalt-chromium alloy, C = yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), and D = leucite-reinforced glass-ceramics. Copings from group 2 were evaluated for the mean marginal gap size (MeanMG) and average maximum marginal gap size (AMaxMG) with a light microscope in the “as-machined” state. The effect of the material on the marginal accuracy was analyzed by multiple pairwise comparisons (Mann–Whitney, U-test, α = 0.05, adjusted by Bonferroni-Holmes method). MeanMG values were as follows: A: 46.92 ± 23.12 μm, B: 48.37 ± 29.72 μm, C: 68.25 ± 28.54 μm, and D: 58.73 ± 21.15 μm. The differences in the MeanMG values proved to be significant for groups A/C (p = 0.0024), A/D (p = 0.008), and B/C (p = 0.0332). AMaxMG values (A: 91.54 ± 23.39 μm, B: 96.86 ± 24.19 μm, C: 120.66 ± 32.75 μm, and D: 100.22 ± 10.83 μm) revealed no significant differences. The material had a significant impact on the marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated copings.
机译:这项研究评估了在同一加工路径中由四种不同材料制成的CAD / CAM制造的冠形帽的边缘精度。扫描了二十个金属母模的石制复制品(准备好的上前磨牙),并将其分为两组。第1组(n = 10)用于中试,以确定最佳边缘精度的设计参数。第2组(n = 10)用于通过一种相同的CAD / CAM系统(GAMMA 202,Wissner GmbH,哥廷根,德国)从以下材料制造10个样品:A =商业纯钛(cp),B =钴铬合金合金,C =氧化钇稳定的氧化锆(YSZ),D =白云石增强的玻璃陶瓷。在“加工后”状态下,使用光学显微镜评估第2组的应对方法的平均边缘间隙大小(MeanMG)和平均最大边缘间隙大小(AMaxMG)。通过多次成对比较(Mann-Whitney,U检验,α= 0.05,通过Bonferroni-Holmes方法调整),分析了材料对边缘精度的影响。平均MG值如下:A:46.92±23.12μm,B:48.37±29.72μm,C:68.25±28.54μm,和D:58.73±21.15μm。对于A / C组(p = 0.0024),A / D(p = 0.008)和B / C(p = 0.0332),MeanMG值的差异被证明是显着的。 AMaxMG值(A:91.54±23.39μm,B:96.86±24.19μm,C:120.66±32.75μm,D:100.22±10.83μm)没有显着差异。该材料对CAD / CAM制造的顶盖的边缘精度有重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号