首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Do Changes in Temperature and Inflation Pressure Affect Rolling Resistance During Road and Track Testing for Fuel Economy of Class 8 Tractor-Trailers?
【2h】

Do Changes in Temperature and Inflation Pressure Affect Rolling Resistance During Road and Track Testing for Fuel Economy of Class 8 Tractor-Trailers?

机译:温度和充气压力的变化是否会在8级拖拉机的燃油经济性道路和轨道测试期间影响滚动阻力?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Data from air cavity thermistors, tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS), and SAE J1269 rolling resistance tests were analyzed to evaluate the significance of changes in tire pressure on rolling resistance during fuel economy tests of class 8 tractor trailers.Thermistor data show that air cavity temperatures vary, with the main increase happening during the warm-up run, and measurable cooling during the fuel measurement breaks between runs. Inflation pressure also increases by 50 - 70 kPa during the warm-up run, but once the tire has warmed up, the pressure is more stable, rarely varying by more than 20 kPa during a test run.Results of SAE J1269 rolling resistance tests allow estimation of rolling resistance force for any specified load and inflation pressure. Using the test weight of the truck, rolling resistance force was estimated for inflation pressures ranging from 550 to 860 kPa. The relationship between the inflation pressure and rolling resistance was roughly linear. The relationship was then used to estimate changes in fuel consumption due to changes in inflation pressure normalized to the cold inflation pressure. For each change of relative inflation pressure of 5%, rolling resistance would change by about 1%. Using a common return factor of a 1% change in fuel consumption for every 5% change in rolling resistance, a change in relative inflation pressure of 5% would result in a change of fuel consumption of about 0.2%. The precision of the J1321 fuel economy tests was measured to be plus or minus about 1%. This suggests that the warm-up run provided for in the test method stabilizes the tire pressure and rolling resistance, and that interference due to changes in rolling resistance during a test run or between runs is a concern only for tests that measure small changes in fuel consumption. While the results obtained here are used to assess the effect of inflation pressure on the SAE J1321 test and only apply to the particular tires tested, the method of analysis may be useful in the assessment of the effect of over- or underinflated tires on fuel consumption in the wider long-haul trucking fleet.
机译:通过对气腔热敏电阻,轮胎压力监测系统(TPMS)和SAE J1269滚动阻力测试的数据进行分析,以评估8级拖拉机挂车的燃油经济性测试期间轮胎压力变化对滚动阻力的重要意义。温度各不相同,主要的变化是在预热运行期间发生的,而燃油测量期间可测量的冷却则在运行之间中断。在预热过程中,充气压力也会增加50-70 kPa,但是一旦轮胎预热,压力就会更稳定,在测试过程中几乎不会变化超过20kPa。SAEJ1269滚动阻力测试的结果表明估算任何指定负载和充气压力下的滚动阻力。使用卡车的测试重量,估算了550至860 kPa的充气压力下的滚动阻力。充气压力与滚动阻力之间的关系大致为线性。然后使用该关系来估计由于归一化为冷充气压力的充气压力的变化而引起的燃料消耗的变化。相对充气压力每变化5%,滚动阻力就会变化约1%。使用滚动阻力每变化5%的油耗变化为1%的常见返回系数,相对充气压力变化5%将导致油耗变化约为0.2%。 J1321燃油经济性测试的精度经测量为正负大约1%。这表明测试方法中提供的预热运行可稳定轮胎压力和滚动阻力,并且在测试运行期间或两次运行之间,由于滚动阻力变化而引起的干扰仅对于测量燃油微小变化的测试而言才是关注的消费。虽然此处获得的结果用于评估充气压力对SAE J1321测试的影响,并且仅适用于所测试的特定轮胎,但分析方法可能有助于评估充气过度或充气不足对燃料消耗的影响。在更广泛的长途运输车队中

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号