首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Biases during DNA extraction affect characterization of the microbiota associated with larvae of the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei
【2h】

Biases during DNA extraction affect characterization of the microbiota associated with larvae of the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei

机译:DNA提取过程中的偏差影响与太平洋白对虾凡纳滨对虾幼体相关的微生物群的表征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For in-depth characterization of the microbiota associated with shrimp larvae, careful selection of DNA isolation procedure is paramount for avoiding biases introduced in community profiling. Four E.Z.N.A.™ DNA extraction kits, i.e., Bacterial, Mollusc, Stool, and Tissue DNA Kits, abbreviated as Ba, Mo, St, and Ti, respectively, were initially evaluated with zoea 2 (Z2) larvae of the Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) by 16S amplicon sequencing on a Illumina MiSeq platform. Further characterization of additional larval samples, specifically nauplii 5 (N5), mysis 1 (M1), and postlarvae 1 (P1), was performed with Ba and St kits to examine the changing microbiota profile during shrimp hatchery period. The results from the Z2 samples showed that DNA yields from the four kits varied significantly (P < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were detected in the α-diversity metrics of the microbiota. By contrast, the St kit, with the lowest DNA yield and quality, successfully recovered DNA from Gram-positive and gut-associated bacterial groups, whereas the Ba kit, which showed maximal microbiota similarity with the Mo kit, manifested the best reproducibility. Notably, significant differences were observed in relative abundances of most dominant taxa when comparing results from the Ba and St kits on Z2, M1, and P1 samples. In addition, the bacterial community identified shifted markedly with larval development regardless of the DNA extraction kits. The DNA recovery biases arising from the larval microbiota could be due to different protocols for cell lysis and purification. Therefore, combined application of different DNA extraction methods may facilitate identification of some biologically important groups owing to their complementary effects. This approach should receive adequate attention for a thorough understanding of the larvae-associated microbiota of the penaeid shrimp.
机译:为了深入表征与虾幼虫有关的微生物群,DNA筛选程序的仔细选择对于避免在社区概况分析中引入偏见至关重要。最初使用太平洋白虾的zoea 2(Z2)幼虫(Litopenaeus)评估了四种EZNA™DNA提取试剂盒,即细菌,软体动物,凳子和组织DNA试剂盒,分别缩写为Ba,Mo,St和Ti。 vannamei)在Illumina MiSeq平台上通过16S扩增子测序。使用Ba和St试剂盒进一步鉴定其他幼体样品,特别是无节幼体5(N5),mysis 1(M1)和幼虫后1(P1),以检查虾孵化期间微生物群的变化。 Z2样品的结果表明,四种试剂盒的DNA产量差异显着(P <0.05),而微生物群的α多样性指标未发现显着差异。相比之下,具有最低DNA产量和质量的St试剂盒成功地从革兰氏阳性和肠道相关细菌组中回收了DNA,而Ba试剂盒与Mo试剂盒具有最大的菌群相似性,表现出最佳的可重复性。值得注意的是,当比较Ba和St试剂盒对Z2,M1和P1样品的结果时,在大多数优势类群的相对丰度上观察到显着差异。此外,无论DNA提取试剂盒如何,细菌群落都鉴定出随着幼虫发育而发生明显变化。幼虫菌群引起的DNA回收偏差可能是由于细胞裂解和纯化的协议不同所致。因此,不同的DNA提取方法的联合应用由于其互补作用,可能有助于鉴定一些生物学上重要的基团。该方法应得到足够的重视,以彻底了解对虾对虾幼虫相关的微生物群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号