首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pharmacology Research Perspectives >Discrepancies in listed adverse drug reactions in pharmaceutical product information supplied by the regulatory authorities in Denmark and the USA
【2h】

Discrepancies in listed adverse drug reactions in pharmaceutical product information supplied by the regulatory authorities in Denmark and the USA

机译:丹麦和美国监管机构提供的药品信息中列出的药物不良反应中的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pharmaceutical product information (PI) supplied by the regulatory authorities serves as a source of information on safe and effective use of drugs. The objectives of this study were to qualitatively and quantitatively compare PIs for selected drugs marketed in both Denmark and the USA with respect to consistency and discrepancy of listed adverse drug reaction (ADR) information. We compared individual ADRs listed in PIs from Denmark and the USA with respect to type and frequency. Consistency was defined as match of ADRs and of ADR frequency or match could not be ruled out. Discrepancies were defined as ADRs listed only in one country or listed with different frequencies. We analyzed PIs for 40 separate drugs from ten therapeutic groups and assigned the 4003 identified ADRs to System Organ Classes (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] terminology). Less than half of listed ADRs (n = 1874; 47%) showed consistency. Discrepancies (n = 2129; 53%) were split into ADRs listed only in the USA (n = 1558; 39%), ADRs listed only in Denmark (n = 325; 8%) and ADRs listed with different frequencies (n = 246; 6%). The majority of listed ADRs were of the type “gastrointestinal disorders” and “nervous system disorders”. Our results show great differences in PIs for drugs approved in both Denmark and the USA illuminating concerns about the credibility of the publicly available PIs. The results also represent an argument for further harmonization across borders to improve consistency between authority-supplied information.
机译:监管机构提供的药品信息(PI)是有关安全有效使用药物的信息来源。这项研究的目的是定性和定量地比较在丹麦和美国市场上销售的选定药物的PI,以列出药物不良反应(ADR)信息的一致性和差异性。我们比较了丹麦和美国的PI中列出的单个ADR的类型和频率。一致性定义为ADR和ADR频率匹配,或者不能排除匹配。差异被定义为仅在一个国家中列出或以不同频率列出的ADR。我们分析了来自10个治疗组的40种独立药物的PI,并将4003种已确定的ADR分配给系统器官分类(《管制活动医学词典》 [MedDRA]术语)。不到列出的ADR的一半(n = 1874; 47%)显示出一致性。差异(n = 2129; 53%)分为仅在美国列出的ADR(n = 1558; 39%),仅在丹麦列出的ADR(n = 325; 8%)和以不同频率列出的ADR(n = 246) ; 6%)。列出的大多数ADR属于“胃肠道疾病”和“神经系统疾病”类型。我们的结果表明,丹麦和美国批准的药品的PI差异很大,这引起了人们对公开PI信誉的担忧。结果也代表了进一步跨界协调以改善授权提供的信息之间一致性的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号