首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Nephrology >Clinical audit a valuable tool to improve quality of care: General methodology and applications in nephrology
【2h】

Clinical audit a valuable tool to improve quality of care: General methodology and applications in nephrology

机译:临床审计一种提高护理质量的宝贵工具:肾脏病学的一般方法和应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Evaluation and improvement of quality of care provided to the patients are of crucial importance in the daily clinical practice and in the health policy planning and financing. Different tools have been developed, including incident analysis, health technology assessment and clinical audit. The clinical audit consist of measuring a clinical outcome or a process, against well-defined standards set on the principles of evidence-based medicine in order to identify the changes needed to improve the quality of care. In particular, patients suffering from chronic renal diseases, present many problems that have been set as topics for clinical audit projects, such as hypertension, anaemia and mineral metabolism management. Although the results of these studies have been encouraging, demonstrating the effectiveness of audit, overall the present evidence is not clearly in favour of clinical audit. These findings call attention to the need to further studies to validate this methodology in different operating scenarios. This review examines the principle of clinical audit, focusing on experiences performed in nephrology settings.
机译:在日常临床实践以及健康政策的规划和筹资中,评估和改善为患者提供的护理质量至关重要。已经开发了各种工具,包括事件分析,健康技术评估和临床审核。临床审核包括根据基于证据的医学原则制定的明确标准来衡量临床结果或过程,以识别改善护理质量所需的变化。尤其是,患有慢性肾脏疾病的患者会出现许多已设置为临床审核项目主题的问题,例如高血压,贫血和矿物质代谢管理。尽管这些研究的结果令人鼓舞,证明了审计的有效性,但总体而言,目前的证据并不明显支持临床审计。这些发现提醒人们需要进一步研究,以在不同的操作场景下验证此方法。这项审查审查临床审核的原则,重点是在肾脏病学背景下进行的经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号