首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM >Ethics of open access to biomedical research: Just a special case of ethics of open access to research
【2h】

Ethics of open access to biomedical research: Just a special case of ethics of open access to research

机译:开放获取生物医学研究伦理:这只是开放获取研究伦理的特例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The ethical case for Open Access (OA) (free online access) to research findings is especially salient when it is public health that is being compromised by needless access restrictions. But the ethical imperative for OA is far more general: It applies to all scientific and scholarly research findings published in peer-reviewed journals. And peer-to-peer access is far more important than direct public access. Most research is funded so as to be conducted and published, by researchers, in order to be taken up, used, and built upon in further research and applications, again by researchers (pure and applied, including practitioners), for the benefit of the public that funded it – not in order to generate revenue for the peer-reviewed journal publishing industry (nor even because there is a burning public desire to read much of it). Hence OA needs to be mandated, by researchers' institutions and funders, for all research.
机译:当公共健康受到不必要的访问限制的损害时,开放获取(OA)(免费在线访问)用于研究结果的道德案例就显得尤为突出。但是,OA的道德要求更为普遍:它适用于在同行评审期刊上发表的所有科学研究成果。对等访问远比直接公共访问重要。大多数研究由研究人员进行资助和发表,以便在进一步研究和应用中被吸收,使用和建立基础,再一次由研究人员(包括实践者在内)进行纯正研究,以造福于人类。资助它的公众–并非是为了为同行评审的期刊出版业创造收入(即使是因为公众强烈希望阅读其中的大部分内容)。因此,研究人员的机构和资助者需要对所有研究强制要求进行OA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号