首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal >A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms
【2h】

A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms

机译:探针放置对质量影响的比较研究B超检查中的B超检查幻影

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To check or to prevent failures in ultrasound medical systems, some tests should be scheduled for both clinical suitability and technical functionality evaluation: among them, image quality assurance tests performed by technicians through ultrasound phantoms are widespread today and their results depend on issues related to scanner settings as well as phantom features and operator experience. In the present study variations on some features of the B-mode image were measured when the ultrasound probe is handled by the technician in a routine image quality test: ultrasound phantom images from two array transducers are processed to evaluate measurement dispersion in distance accuracy, high contrast spatial resolution and penetration depth when probe is handled by the operator. All measurements are done by means of an in-house image analysis software that minimizes errors due to operator’s visual acuity and subjective judgment while influences of ultrasound transducer position on quality assurance test results are estimated as expanded uncertainties on parameters above (measurement reproducibility at 95 percent confidence level): depending on the probe model, they ranged from ±0.1 to ±1.9 mm in high contrast spatial resolution, from ±0.1 to ±5.5 percent in distance measurements error and from ±1 to ±10 mm in maximum depth of signal visualization. Although numerical results are limited to the two examined probes, they confirm some predictions based on general working principles of diagnostic ultrasound systems: (a) measurements strongly depend on settings as well on phantoms features, probes and parameters investigated; (b) relative uncertainty due to probe manipulation on spatial resolution can be very high, i.e. from 10 to more than 30 percent; (c) Field of View settings must be taken into account for measurement reproducibility as well as Dynamic Range compression and phantom attenuation.
机译:为了检查或防止超声医疗系统中的故障,应安排一些测试以同时进行临床适用性和技术功能评估:其中,如今,由技术人员通过超声体模执行的图像质量保证测试非常普遍,其结果取决于与扫描仪有关的问题。设置以及幻像功能和操作员体验。在本研究中,当技术人员在常规图像质量测试中操作超声探头时,测量了B模式图像某些特征的变化:处理了来自两个阵列换能器的超声幻象图像,以评估距离精度的测量色散,高操作员操作探头时,对比空间分辨率和穿透深度。所有测量均通过内部图像分析软件完成,该软件可最大程度地减少操作员的视敏度和主观判断引起的误差,而超声换能器位置对质量保证测试结果的影响估计为上述参数的不确定性扩大(测量可重复性达到95%)置信水平):根据探头型号的不同,它们在高对比度空间分辨率中的范围为±0.1至±1.9 mm,距离测量误差的范围为±0.1至±5.5%,最大的信号可视化深度范围为±1至±10 mm 。尽管数值结果仅限于两种检查的探头,但它们证实了基于诊断超声系统一般工作原理的一些预测:(a)测量在很大程度上取决于设置以及体模特征,探头和所研究的参数; (b)由于探针对空间分辨率的操纵而引起的相对不确定性可能很高,即从10%到30%以上; (c)必须考虑视场设置,以确保测量的可重复性以及动态范围压缩和幻像衰减。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号