文章整合已有产业融合路径研究，从融合领域、融合过程、融合性质三个视角出发，运用投入产出模型和VAR模型，动态分析了中国金融业与其他服务行业的融合路径情况。研究发现：金融业与其他服务业的前向融合大于后向融合，前向融合逐渐增强，后向融合逐渐减弱。结合融合领域、过程和性质来看，在投资研究阶段，金融业主要与商务服务业进行功能渗透和市场重组式融合；在管理运营阶段，金融业与其他服务行业融合路径主要体现为与信息传输、计算机服务和软件业的技术渗透、市场重组融合；在业务拓展阶段，金融业融合路径主要包括与房地产业，住宿、餐饮业，交通运输、仓储及邮电业等的功能互补融合，以及与批发零售业，信息传输、计算机服务和软件业的市场重组融合。研究结论对于政府经济管理部门、企业以及有关产业经济研究人员都有一定参考价值。%The existing research about industrial convergence paths is integrated. The research is starting from convergence areas , process and properties, used the input-output model and the VAR model to make dynamic and comprehensive analysis, which reveals the industrial convergence in Chinese financial industry and other service industries. The conclusions are as follows. Firstly , the forward convergence among Chinese financial industry and other service industries is stronger than the backwards convergence. The former one is growing, but the latter gradually weakened. Secondly, in the investment research stage, financial industry and business services chiefly experience function penetration and market recombinant convergence. While, in the management and operation stage, financial industry and some service industries, such as the information transmission, computer service and software industry technology, have mainly un-dergone technology penetration and market recombinant convergence. At the same time, in the business development stage, the function complement convergence of financial industry occurs among the real estate industry, accommodation, catering, transportation, storage and postal industry function complementary fusion. Also, the market recombinant convergence of financial industry takes place among wholesale and retail trade, information transmission, computer service and software industry.
展开▼
