3种方法检测宫腔刮吸器清洗效果的对比研究

摘要

Objective To discuss the effects of three detection methods of the cleaning of uterine cavity aspirator and to provide basis for clinical application.Methods 300 sets of uterine cavity aspirators after untrasonic cleaning were divided into 3 groups.Uterine cavity aspirators in Croup A (n-100) were detected by Lustration test,in Group B (n-100) by Hemocheck and in Group C (n-100) by Clean-trace TM.Results Positive rate was 1% in group A,7% in group B and 9% in group C,which showed statistic significance (P=0.039).Conclusion Hemocheck and Clean-trace TM perform better than Lustration lest does in monitoring the cleaning of uterine cavity aspirator.And Heinoclieek could be applied to detect residual blood while Clean-trace TM to detect residual protein.%目的 探讨3种方法检测宫腔刮吸器清洗质量的效果,为临床选用清洗质量检测方法提供依据.方法 抽取2010年11月-2011年3月在消毒供应中心超声清洗后目测合格的宫腔刮吸器300件随机分成杰力试纸检测组、洁察血红蛋白检测剂组、3M蛋白清洗测试棒检测组,每组各100件,比较3组宫腔刮吸器检测阳性率.结果 杰力试纸检测组阳性率为1%,洁察血红蛋白检测剂组阳性率为7%,3M蛋白清洗测试棒检测组阳性率为9%,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.039);洁察血红蛋白检测剂组与3M蛋白清洗测试棒检测组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.602).结论 3种用于宫腔刮吸器清洗质量的检测方法,以洁察血红蛋白检测剂、3M蛋白清洗测试棒为优,其中洁察血红蛋白检测剂主要用于检测残留血迹,3M蛋白清洗测试棒则用于表面残留蛋白的检测,临床可结合需要加以选用.