首页> 中文期刊> 《现代肿瘤医学》 >常规US、CEUS及增强CT检出转移性肝癌的价值

常规US、CEUS及增强CT检出转移性肝癌的价值

         

摘要

目的:比较二维超声( US)、超声造影( CEUS)及增强CT( CECT)对肝转移癌的检出率,探讨CEUS对肝转移癌的临床应用价值。方法:对67例已确诊肝转移癌患者进行US、CEUS及CECT检查,比较三种影像学方法对肝转移癌的检出率。结果:肝转移癌CEUS延迟期均呈低回声充盈缺损,动脉期表现为团状增强、环状增强、不均匀增强、低增强、等增强等五种增强模式。US和CEUS检出转移灶数分别为(1.8±1.3)个和(4.2±1.7)个(P<0.05),检出率分别为51.5%和91.9%(P<0.05)。CEUS与CECT对转移癌检出率差异无统计学意义。结论:CEUS较常规超声明显提高了对肝转移癌的检出率,CEUS及CECT两者互补,可提高诊断率,在肝转移癌检测方面有较好的应用前景。%Objective:To evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound( CEUS)on the detection of hepatic metastases in comparison with conventional ultrasonography( US ) and contrast - enhanced computed tomography ( CECT). Methods:Sixty-seven patients with hepatic metastases underwent US,CEUS and CECT images. Results:Hepatic metastases showed five enhancement patterns with CEUS,including bolus hyper -enhancement,peripheral rim enhancement,inhomogeneous enhancement with necrosis,hypo-enhancement,isoenhancement with liver paren-chyma,all hepatic metastases showed dark defects in portal and delayed phase . The mean number of metastases with CEUS was greater than that of US(4. 2 ± 1. 7 vs 1. 8 ± 1. 3,P<0. 05). The detection of hepatic metastases was 51. 5% and 91. 9% respectively(P<0. 05). CEUS and CECT had no statistically significast difference in the de-tection of hepatic metastases(P>0. 05). Conclusion:CEUS can improve detection of hepatic metastases.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号