When it comes to firm's effectiveness and efficiency, there is no simplistic comparison between state-owned enterprises (SOE) and private firms, given their distinctions in economic nature, goals and the mode of production. The perception of SOE's unavoidable inefficiency is simply a generic product of a close-system approach of western economics. However in China, its formation is also attributed to the impact of epistemological idealism as the result of recency effect, halo effect and representative heuristics. Methodologically, it inclines to oversimplification, extremism, and overboard-going rectification for rightfulness. As the result, in the measurement of, measurement of economic efficiency, a paradigm of double-standard is established,infused with capitalistic values and ideology. The logical revelation by this measurement justifies privatization as the only means to achieve economic effectiveness and efficiency. However, holistic materialist analyses expose its nature of pseudo science in economic methodology.%国有企业在性质、目的、生产方式等方面与私有企业的差异性决定二者在效率效益上没有简单可比性。国有企业效率效益低下论是西方经济学封闭系统方法论的一般性产物。而在中国，它的产生与形成还具有近因效应、光环效应、代表性启发式思维等唯心主义认识论影响，也是在事物（效率效益）分析上逻辑简单化、极端化、矫枉过正、用事物现象代替事物本质等方法论作用的结果。这些方法论的运用在企业效率效益衡量上形成了带有资本主义价值观与意识形态色彩的双重标准范式，其逻辑关系就是试图证明私有化才是唯一提高效率效益的手段。而整体主义、唯物主义的方法论分析则揭示出这种论点在经济学方法论上的伪科学性。
展开▼
