首页> 外文学位 >Fatal attractions: Curare-based arrow poisons, from medical innovation to lethal injection.
【24h】

Fatal attractions: Curare-based arrow poisons, from medical innovation to lethal injection.

机译:致命的吸引力:从医疗创新到致命注射的基于Curare的箭毒。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the late-1930s and early 1940s, the American pharmaceutical industry launched the first modern paralyzing drugs based on indigenous South-American arrow-poisons (curare). Their advent was celebrated by biomedicine, and their utility as adjuncts to surgical anesthesia is undeniable. This dissertation, however, follows several lesser- known, yet troubling paths of paralyzing agents once in Western hands. This study begins by challenging representations which juxtaposed the new, modern drugs to their untamed and dangerous origins, proclaiming a beneficent future in biomedicine. From there, the dissertation revisits the nineteenth-century dispute over the use of curare in animal experimentation, particularly in Britain, giving special attention to the 1875 Royal Commission on Vivisection. By exploring the legal and cultural discourses that emerged at that time, the dissertation shows how curare was transformed from a tool of scientific inquiry into an emblem of cruelty, a cause for social action, and a demand for government restriction. The dissertation then shifts focus to the specific problems of curarizing drugs and human subjects, beginning with early clinical forays against tetanus and hydrophobia, contemporary to the antivivisection debate, and then describing ethically-problematic roles for paralyzing drugs with human subjects in the twentieth-century, giving special emphasis to paralyzing drugs in convulsive shock therapy, in the chemical suffocation of "behavior-modification" experiments, and finally in the lethal-injection protocol of United States capital punishment. The dissertation concludes that the current controversy over paralyzing drugs in lethal injection has largely overlooked a rich and critically relevant history of earlier controversies with similar chemical agents. Together, they speak not only to the politics, history and ethics of human and animal-subjects experimentation, but also to the unique powers and dangers of paralyzing agents which can abet cruelty, hide excruciating pain, and deflect empathy. The episodes described in this dissertation are offered as a necessary foreground and counterpoint to the current use of paralyzing drugs in United States capital punishment.
机译:在1930年代末和1940年代初,美国制药业推出了第一种基于南美土著箭毒(curare)的现代瘫痪药物。它们的出现受到生物医学的赞誉,不可否认它们作为手术麻醉的辅助手段。然而,这篇论文遵循了西方人所知的几种鲜为人知但令人困扰的麻痹剂路径。这项研究从具有挑战性的表述开始,这些表述将新的现代药物与它们未经驯服和危险的起源并列在一起,宣称在生物医学方面是美好的未来。从那里开始,论文重新审视了19世纪关于在动物实验中使用Curare(特别是在英国)的争议,并特别关注了1875年的皇家活体解剖委员会。通过探索当时出现的法律和文化话语,论文显示了咖喱是如何从科学探究工具转变为残酷象征,社会行动根源和对政府限制的要求的。然后,论文将重点转移到对药物和人类受试者进行治疗的特定问题上,首先是针对破伤风和疏水症的早期临床尝试,当代抗活体检查的争论,然后描述在20世纪人类受试者麻痹药物的伦理问题,特别强调在惊厥性休克疗法中瘫痪药物,“行为修饰”实验的化学窒息,最后是美国死刑的注射死刑协议。论文的结论是,当前关于致死性注射中的麻痹药物的争论在很大程度上已经忽略了与类似化学制剂有关的较早争议的丰富且至关重要的历史。他们在一起,不仅谈到人类和动物实验的政治,历史和伦理,而且谈到瘫痪者的独特力量和危险,瘫痪者可以教cru残忍,掩盖极度痛苦并转移同理心。本文所描述的事件是美国死刑中麻痹性药物当前使用的必要前景和对策。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hoffman, Daniel Jon.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Cultural.;Health Sciences Pharmacy.;Economics History.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 491 p.
  • 总页数 491
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号