首页> 外文学位 >Judicial implementation of U.S. Supreme Court fair housing decisions: An analysis of lower court decisional trends and compliance.
【24h】

Judicial implementation of U.S. Supreme Court fair housing decisions: An analysis of lower court decisional trends and compliance.

机译:美国最高法院公平住房判决的司法执行:对下级法院判决趋势和合规性的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research focuses on the judicial implementation of landmark Supreme Court fair housing decisions. It makes a theoretical and substantive contribution to the judicial implementation literature by examining both the positive and negative motivations for compliance. Major fair housing cases and the context in which they were decided are analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. The tools and strategies that were relied on to enforce housing segregation are each reviewed in turn. Principal-agent theory is drawn on to derive hypotheses, which are tested using data on Courts of Appeals and state supreme court decisions. The theory is based on the premise that the Supreme Court selectively monitors and sanctions the lower courts in order to create an effective principal-agent relationship. Compliance is measured on a four-part scale starting with resistance and ending with expansive compliance. The analyses show that both monitoring and sanctioning have an effect on the behavior of lower court judges. After racially restrictive zoning ordinances were declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, the majority of lower courts complied with the precedent. Following the racially restrictive covenant cases, state courts that were previously reversed by the Supreme Court were more likely to comply with precedent in that issue area. Monitoring by the Supreme Court increased the likelihood of Courts of Appeals panels finding in favor of claimants bringing a 42 U.S.C. 1982 suit. Compliance with Supreme Court decisions by lower court judges is the norm in the area of fair housing. Even in instances where a great deal of resistance to Supreme Court precedent would be expected, the lower courts still complied in the vast majority of cases. The threat of reversal does appear to play some role in the behavior of lower court judges, but judicial norms and socialization are also quite influential and deserve further study.
机译:这项研究的重点是具有里程碑意义的最高法院公平住房裁决的司法执行。通过考察遵守的积极动机和消极动机,它为司法执行文献提供了理论和实质性贡献。使用定量和定性方法分析重大的公平住房案件及其决定的背景。依次审查了用于实施住房隔离的工具和策略。委托代理理论被用来推导假设,这些假设使用上诉法院的数据和州最高法院的判决进行检验。该理论基于这样的前提,即最高法院有选择地监视和制裁下级法院,以建立有效的委托-代理关系。依从性分为四个部分,从抵抗性开始到以扩大的依从性结束。分析表明,监督和制裁对下级法院法官的行为都有影响。在最高法院宣布种族限制区划法令违宪之后,大多数下级法院都遵循了先例。在种族限制的契约案之后,先前由最高法院推翻的州法院更有可能遵守该问题领域的判例。最高法院的监视增加了上诉法院小组认定有利于原告将42 U.S.C. 1982年的西装。低级法院法官遵守最高法院的裁决是公平住房领域的规范。即使在预计将对最高法院的判例有很大抵抗的情况下,在大多数案件中,下级法院仍会遵守。逆转的威胁确实在下级法院法官的行为中起了一定作用,但是司法规范和社会化也具有相当的影响力,值得进一步研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nye, Adam W.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 203 p.
  • 总页数 203
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号