首页> 外文学位 >Toward a New Paradigm of East Asian Yogacara Buddhism: Taehyon (ca. 8th century CE), a Korean Yogacara monk, and His Predecessors.
【24h】

Toward a New Paradigm of East Asian Yogacara Buddhism: Taehyon (ca. 8th century CE), a Korean Yogacara monk, and His Predecessors.

机译:迈向东亚瑜珈卡拉佛教的新范式:太彦(约公元8世纪),韩国瑜珈卡拉僧侣和他的前任。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation seeks to locate the place of Taehy&dotbelow;oˇn (ca. 8th century CE), a Silla Korean Yogacara monk, within the broader East Asian Buddhist tradition. My task is not confined solely to a narrow study of Taehy&dotbelow;oˇn's thought and career, but is principally concerned with understanding the wider contours of the East Asian Yogacara tradition itself and how these contours are reflected in Taehy&dotbelow;oˇn's extant oeuvre. There are problems in determining Taehy&dotbelow;oˇn's doctrinal position within the traditional paradigms of East Asian Yogacara tradition, that is, the bifurcations of Tathagatagarbha and Yogacara ; Old and New Yogacara ; the One Vehicle and Three Vehicles; and the Dharma Nature and Dharma Characteristics schools. Taehy&dotbelow;oˇn's extant works contain doctrines drawn from across these various divides, and his doctrinal positions therefore do not precisely fit any of these traditional paradigms. In order to address this issue, this dissertation examines how these bifurcations originated and evolved over time, across the geographical expanse of the East Asian Yogacara tradition. The chapters of the dissertation discuss in largely chronological order the theoretical problems involved in these bifurcations within Yogacara and proposes possible resolutions to these problems, by focusing on the works of such major Buddhist exegetes as Paramartha (499--569), Ji (632--682), Woˇnhyo (617--686), Fazang (643--712), and, finally, Taehy&dotbelow;oˇn.
机译:本论文力图在更广泛的东亚佛教传统中定位新罗韩国瑜伽传佛教僧侣Taehy&ocaron(公元8世纪)。我的任务不仅限于对Taehy  oˇ n的思想和职业进行狭study的研究,而且主要是要了解东亚Yogacara传统的更广泛的轮廓,以及这些轮廓如何在Taehy  oˇ n的现存作品中得到体现。 。在确定Taehy o'caron在东亚Yogacara传统的传统范式(即,如来他加陀罗与Yogacara的分歧)中的教义地位时,存在一些问题。新旧Yogacara;一车三车;以及佛法自然与佛法特色学校。泰希·奥卡隆的现存作品包含了跨越这些不同鸿沟的学说,因此他的教义立场与这些传统范式并不完全吻合。为了解决这个问题,本论文研究了这些分叉是如何随着时间的推移在东亚瑜伽会传统的地理范围内起源和演变的。论文的各章按时间先后顺序讨论了瑜伽car内这些分叉中涉及的理论问题,并着重研究了主要佛教佛祖如帕拉玛莎(499--569),纪(632- -682),Woˇ nhyo(617--686),Fazang(643--712),最后是Taehy' oˇ n。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee, Sumi.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Religion General.;Asian Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 269 p.
  • 总页数 269
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号