首页> 外文学位 >Effectiveness of Visual-Based Safety Training Compared with Non-Visual Based Safety Training in the Meat Processing Industry for Non-English Speaking, Hispanic.
【24h】

Effectiveness of Visual-Based Safety Training Compared with Non-Visual Based Safety Training in the Meat Processing Industry for Non-English Speaking, Hispanic.

机译:在肉类加工行业中,基于视觉的安全培训与基于非视觉的安全培训相比,针对讲非英语的西班牙裔的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this research was to identify whether visual-based safety training for non-English, Spanish speaking employees in the meat industry is more effective than non-visual training. The literature review included in this thesis studies the known barriers to training Hispanic workers, the existing training methods out there for safety training, and the best forms of safety training for non-English, Spanish speaking workers.;The methodology in this research evaluated the effectiveness of visual-based training versus a non-visual training for non-English, Spanish speaking employees in the meat industry. Two training sessions with a total of 30 volunteers was organized in order to evaluate which method would be more effective. One group was presented with a visual-based training while the other group received the exact same information read out loud with no visuals to accompany. Each participant was given the same 15 question quiz at the end of their session to find if one group retained more information than the other.;The results of this study did find an observational difference in quiz results between the two groups, showing the group with the visual-based training performed better, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two. However, further discussion finds that education level of participants and the small sample size could be a negative factor. The results do open up the opportunity for further research.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定对肉类行业非英语,西班牙语的雇员进行基于视觉的安全培训是否比非视觉培训更有效。本论文中包括的文献综述研究了培训西班牙裔工人的已知障碍,现有的安全培训方法以及针对非英语,西班牙语的工人的最佳安全培训形式。基于视觉的培训与针对肉类行业非英语,西班牙语的非视觉培训的有效性。组织了总共30名志愿者的两次培训,以评估哪种方法更有效。一组接受了基于视觉的培训,而另一组接受了大声读出的完全相同的信息,没有视觉陪伴。在会议结束时,每位参与者都进行了相同的15个问题测验,以发现一组是否比另一组保留了更多的信息。这项研究的结果确实发现了两组之间测验结果的观察差异,显示了基于视觉的训练效果更好,但是两者之间在统计学上没有显着差异。但是,进一步的讨论发现,参与者的教育水平和较小的样本量可能是不利因素。研究结果确实为进一步研究提供了机会。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rinehart, Erika K.;

  • 作者单位

    Eastern Kentucky University.;

  • 授予单位 Eastern Kentucky University.;
  • 学科 Foreign language.;Occupational safety.;Adult education.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 73 p.
  • 总页数 73
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号