首页> 外文学位 >Digital forensics in law enforcement: A need based analysis of Indiana agencies.
【24h】

Digital forensics in law enforcement: A need based analysis of Indiana agencies.

机译:执法中的数字取证:基于需求的印第安纳州机构分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Cyber crime is a growing problem, with the impact to both businesses and individuals increasing exponentially, but the ability of law enforcement agencies to investigate and successfully prosecute criminals for these crimes is unclear. Many national needs assessments were conducted in the late 1990's and early 2000's by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), which all indicated that state and local law enforcement did not have the training, tools, or staff to effectively conduct digital investigations (Institute for Security and Technology Studies [ISTS], 2002; NIJ, 2004). Additionally, there have been some studies conducted at the state level, however, to date, none have been conducted in Indiana (Gogolin & Jones, 2010). A quick search of the Internet located multiple training opportunities and publications that are available at no cost to state and local law enforcement, but it is not clear how many agencies use these resources ("State, Local, & Tribal" for FLETC, n.d.; https://www.ncfi. usss.gov). This study provided a current and localized assessment of the ability of Indiana law enforcement agencies to effectively investigate when a crime that involves digital evidence is alleged to have occurred, the availability of training for both law enforcement officers and prosecuting attorneys, and the ability of prosecuting attorneys to pursue and obtain convictions in cases involving digital evidence. Through an analysis of the survey responses by Indiana law enforcement agencies and prosecutors' offices, it is evident that Indiana agencies have improved their ability to investigate crimes with digital evidence, with more than half with employees on staff who have attended a digital forensic training course within the past five years. However, a large majority of the agencies still perceive their abilities to investigate crimes with digital evidence in the mid-range or lower. The results support the recommendation that a comprehensive resource guide needs to be made available that the agencies can use to locate experts, obtain assistance with standard operating procedures, learn about free training courses, and find funding opportunities to increase their capabilities in investigating crimes involving digital evidence.
机译:网络犯罪是一个日益严重的问题,对企业和个人的影响均呈指数级增长,但是执法机构针对这些犯罪进行调查并成功起诉罪犯的能力尚不清楚。司法部(DOJ)和国家司法研究所(NIJ)在1990年代末和2000年代初进行了许多国家需求评估,这些评估都表明州和地方执法机构没有培训,工具或人员有效地进行数字调查(安全与技术研究所[ISTS],2002; NIJ,2004)。此外,在州一级进行了一些研究,但迄今为止,在印第安纳州尚未进行任何研究(Gogolin&Jones,2010)。快速搜索互联网可以找到许多培训机会和出版物,而州和地方执法部门可免费获得这些培训机会和出版物,但是尚不清楚有多少机构使用这些资源(FLETC的“州,地方和部落”; https://www.ncfi.usss.gov)。这项研究提供了当前和局部的评估,以评估印第安纳州执法机构有效调查涉嫌发生涉及数字证据的犯罪的时间,对执法人员和起诉律师的培训的可用性以及起诉的能力在涉及数字证据的案件中寻求律师并获得定罪的律师。通过对印第安纳州执法机构和检察官办公室的调查回复进行分析,很明显,印第安纳州的机构已经提高了利用数字证据调查犯罪的能力,其中超过一半的员工参加了数字司法鉴定培训课程。在过去五年内。但是,大多数机构仍然认为他们有能力使用中端或中端的数字证据调查犯罪。结果支持以下建议:需要提供全面的资源指南,各机构可用来查找专家,获得标准操作程序的帮助,了解免费培训课程以及寻找资金机会以提高其调查涉及数字犯罪的能力证据。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cummins Flory, Teri A.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Criminology.;Computer science.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 76 p.
  • 总页数 76
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号