首页> 外文学位 >The limits of accommodation: How Khrushchev, Ulbricht, and the Western allies failed to neutralize West Berlin, 1958--1960 (Nikita Khrushchev, Walter Ulbricht, Germany, Soviet Union).
【24h】

The limits of accommodation: How Khrushchev, Ulbricht, and the Western allies failed to neutralize West Berlin, 1958--1960 (Nikita Khrushchev, Walter Ulbricht, Germany, Soviet Union).

机译:居住限制:赫鲁晓夫,乌布利希特和西方盟友如何未能中和西柏林,1958年至1960年(尼基塔·赫鲁晓夫,沃尔特·乌尔布里希特,德国,苏联)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Urged by the East Germans and emboldened by signs of American irresolution, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev started threatening allied military access to West Berlin in November 1958. The communists aimed to capture the city in order to consolidate the postwar status quo and soften the Western alliance in preparation of further advances. Unlike 1948--49, they refrained from threatening the West Berliners directly, targeting instead what they termed the "obsolete" US, British, and French occupation rights. They calculated that a forced withdrawal of the allied garrisons would doom West Berlin, seal the division of Germany, and irreparably damage the prestige of NATO, particularly the United States. This would usher in the Soviet domination of Western Europe and bring communism's world-wide victory one giant step closer.; The allied response was weak. Rather than nip creeping aggression in the bud, democracies generally prefer to stall until the danger becomes acute. In declining order from US President Dwight Eisenhower to French President Charles de Gaulle, the allies also secretly wished to rid themselves of the liability West Berlin. They sought a face-saving way to shorten their front lines and eliminate this irritant between East and West. At least the Americans and the British were rather naive about the prospects of a genuine detente with the USSR and ready to pay a considerable price for it. Against growing resistance from Bonn, the allies offered to weaken West Berlin's freedom, phase out their own presence, and recognize the postwar status quo in Germany and Europe.; But Khrushchev neither had the patience to allow a slow Western retreat nor the courage to quicken the pace by blocking allied access. Deadlock resulted in 1960. The allied appeasement continued under President John Kennedy, save on the central question of Berlin. Khrushchev eventually sought to resolve the impasse by menacing the United States directly with missiles emplaced in Cuba. Only this gamble's defeat impressed him with the risks of his confrontational course and ended the Berlin crisis soon thereafter.
机译:苏联总理尼基塔·赫鲁晓夫(Nikita Khrushchev)在东德人的敦促下并受到美国的不安情绪鼓舞,于1958年11月开始威胁盟军进入西柏林。共产主义者旨在占领这座城市,以巩固战后的现状并软化西方联盟。准备进一步的进展。与1948--49不同,他们没有直接威胁西柏林人,而是以他们所谓的“过时”的美国,英国和法国占领权为目标。他们计算出,盟军驻军的强行撤离将注定西柏林的灭亡,将德国分裂,并不可避免地损害北约的声望,尤其是美国的声望。这将导致苏联在西欧的统治,并将共产主义的全球胜利拉近一大步。盟军的反应微弱。民主国家通常宁愿拖延直至危险变得尖锐,而不是在蕾丝上nip之以鼻。从美国总统艾森豪威尔(Dwight Eisenhower)到法国总统戴高乐(Charles de Gaulle)的命令减少,盟国还暗中希望摆脱对西柏林的责任。他们寻求一种节省面子的方法,以缩短他们的前线并消除东西方之间的烦恼。至少美国人和英国人对与苏联真正陷入僵局的前景相当天真,并准备为此付出可观的代价。在波恩抵抗力日益增强的情况下,盟国提出削弱西柏林的自由,逐步淘汰自己的存在并承认战后德国和欧洲的现状。但是赫鲁晓夫既没有耐心让西方人缓慢撤退,也没有勇气通过阻止盟军进入来加快步伐。僵局于1960年产生。联盟的app靖行动在约翰·肯尼迪总统(John Kennedy)领导下继续进行,但柏林的核心问题除外。赫鲁晓夫最终试图通过直接向古巴投放导弹来威胁美国,以解决僵局。只有这场赌博的失败才给他留下了对抗路线的风险,并在此后不久结束了柏林危机。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wehrenpfennig, Joerg.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of New Mexico.;

  • 授予单位 The University of New Mexico.;
  • 学科 History Modern.; History United States.; History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 538 p.
  • 总页数 538
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 现代史(1917年~);美洲史;欧洲史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号