首页> 外文学位 >Learning Chinese characters: A comparative study of the learning strategies of students whose native language is alphabet-based and students whose native language is character-based.
【24h】

Learning Chinese characters: A comparative study of the learning strategies of students whose native language is alphabet-based and students whose native language is character-based.

机译:学习汉字:对以字母为母语的学生和以字符为母语的学生的学习策略的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The number of university students studying the Chinese-language in the United States has been increasing in recent years. But despite the growing number research studies regarding learning strategies, and language-learning strategies, little research has been conducted on the most effective methods of learning Chinese characters. A review of the literature has revealed no study that addresses this issue with an eye to the question whether students whose first language is alphabet-based use character-learning strategies in a manner that differ from the use of such strategies by students whose first language is character-based. This case study examines that question.; Two groups of students enrolled in a third-semester Chinese-language course participated in this study. The "alphabet-based" group consisted of American students whose native language was English, and the "character-based" group consist of native-Japanese students whose native language was Japanese. Interviews were conducted with all participants in the study. The participants' "study logs" were examined, and the researcher observed each participant's progress throughout the relevant semester to provide corroborative and evaluative data. Analysis of data showed that all participants from both groups viewed the task of Chinese-character learning as a difficult one, and consequently all employed learning strategies of various types, both direct and indirect, throughout the studied semester.; The study revealed that both groups used memory and cognitive strategies approximately equally, but that the groups emphasized different subcomponents of those strategies. Both groups reported usage of metacognitive strategies an equal amount, but the American group was more capable of describing how, exactly, such strategies were employed; and the Japanese group used compensation and social strategies to a greater extent.
机译:近年来,在美国学习中文的大学生人数一直在增加。但是,尽管有关学习策略和语言学习策略的研究越来越多,但对于最有效的学习汉字方法的研究却很少。文献综述显示,没有针对这一问题的研究,而是以母语为基础的学生是否以不同于母语为母语的学生使用字符学习策略的方式来解决这一问题。基于字符。本案例研究探讨了这个问题。参加第三学期中文课程的两组学生参加了这项研究。 “基于字母的”组由母语为英语的美国学生组成,而“基于字符的”组由母语为日语的日本本地学生组成。与研究中的所有参与者进行了访谈。检查参与者的“学习日志”,研究人员观察了整个相关学期中每个参与者的进度,以提供确证和评估数据。数据分析表明,两组学生都认为汉字学习是一项艰巨的任务,因此在整个学期中,他们都采用了直接和间接的各种学习策略。该研究表明,两组人在记忆和认知策略上的使用大致相同,但是两组人强调了这些策略的不同组成部分。两组都报告了元认知策略的使用量相等,但是美国组更能描述这种策略的使用方式。日本集团更广泛地使用薪酬和社会策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Arrow, Ju-Chuan.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Oklahoma.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Oklahoma.;
  • 学科 Education Language and Literature.; Language Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 106 p.
  • 总页数 106
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号