首页> 外文学位 >Networks, network change, and environmental protection: Soviet and post-Soviet policies toward Lake Baikal (Russia).
【24h】

Networks, network change, and environmental protection: Soviet and post-Soviet policies toward Lake Baikal (Russia).

机译:网络,网络变化与环境保护:苏联和后苏联对贝加尔湖(俄罗斯)的政策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation seeks to explain two apparent contradictions in Soviet and Russian environmental policy. Why did the same Soviet government that so heavily contaminated its air, water, and soil with agro-industrial pollutants also create and maintain an extensive system of strictly protected nature preserves? Why has post-Soviet Russia increasingly enacted measures for both pollution control and nature conservation, while largely failing to implement either? How did the barrier between success and failure in environmental policy change from a horizontal one between issue areas to a vertical one between levels of policy making?; The dissertation uses a policy-network framework to explain the outcomes of environmentalists' attempts to safeguard Siberia's "blue pearl," Lake Baikal. The systemic changes of perestroika and the post-Soviet transition presented opportunities and constraints to two existing policy networks. These allowed the environmental network to expand its influence in enacting central policies, while curtailing the center's ability to control policy implementation in the regions, where the agro-industrial production networks continued to hold sway. This accounts for the fate of the several protected territories surrounding Lake Baikal and of the pulp-and-paper mill that was built on the lakeshore in the 1960s and continues to operate, despite a series of federal resolutions calling for its closure.; This study shows that environmental performance varied significantly within the USSR, and that systemic-level variables alone cannot fully account for that performance. It shows how actors change institutions (in this case, networks) in response to external changes, and how these institutional changes in turn affect policy outcomes. It suggests taking a more differentiated approach to "state capacity," seeing it as the result of resource dependencies linking central policy makers to other political "stakeholders."
机译:本文试图解释苏联和俄罗斯环境政策中两个明显的矛盾。为何同一苏联政府曾用农业工业污染物严重污染了其空气,水和土壤,而且还建立并维护了广泛的严格保护自然保护区系统?为什么后苏联时期的俄罗斯越来越多地颁布了污染控制和自然保护措施,而基本上都没有执行?环境政策成败之间的壁垒如何从问题领域之间的水平障碍变为政策制定水平之间的垂直障碍?论文使用了一个政策网络框架来解释环保主义者保卫西伯利亚“蓝珍珠”贝加尔湖的尝试的结果。改革和后苏联过渡的系统性变化为两个现有的政策网络带来了机遇和制约。这些措施使环境网络可以扩大其在制定中央政策方面的影响力,而同时又削弱了该中心控制在农业工业生产网络继续占主导地位的地区实施政策的能力。 ;这解释了贝加尔湖周围几个受保护领土的命运以及1960年代在湖岸上建造并持续运行的制浆造纸厂的命运,尽管一系列联邦决议要求关闭该厂。这项研究表明,苏联内部的环境绩效差异很大,仅系统级变量就不能完全解释这一绩效。它显示了参与者如何响应外部变化而改变机构(在本例中为网络),以及这些机构变化又如何影响政策结果。它建议对“国家能力”采取更加差异化的方法,将其视为将中央决策者与其他政治“利益相关者”联系​​在一起的资源依赖的结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Venable, Sondra.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 313 p.
  • 总页数 313
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号