首页> 外文学位 >Journalism, Activism and Counter-public Sphere in China: A Case Study of a Contentious Journalist Community in Guangzhou.
【24h】

Journalism, Activism and Counter-public Sphere in China: A Case Study of a Contentious Journalist Community in Guangzhou.

机译:中国的新闻,行动主义和反公共领域:以广州一个有争议的新闻工作者社区为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It is often argued that China does not have a public sphere. The reality of public discussion and public discourse in China is very far away from the Habermasian ideal. However, as an intermediate realm between the state and the private, the manefestation of the public sphere has many variations in different societies across different historical moments. Like everywhere else, various forms of public sphere exist and have existed in China, now and in history. Especially, in 21st century China with the state gradually losing control over society, a counter-public sphere is being formed around many facets of social life, including the often-studied enviromentalism, feminism and AIDS activism, as well as the relatively less-studied journalism. The most recent decade has seen the rise of what may be described as "contentious journalists" as a prominent social group in the Chinese media and political scene, while radical and alternative forms of journalism have become a major ground for educating counter-publics and mobilizing political contention. This thesis is a concrete case study analyzing how a journalism-cum-activism counterpublic sphere is formed in contemporary China within the fissures of state control. Specifically, it looks at the formation of a counter-public sphere based in a community of contentious journalists in Guangzhou. It argues that thirty years of media reform have significantly changed the traditional relationship between the Chinese media and the state, and subsequently led to the rise of such contentious journalists. To the extent that mainstream media often serve as principal institutions of the official public sphere, the political significance of the rise of contentious journalists in contemporary Chinese society is that they facilite the formation of a counter-public sphere. Drawing on ethnographic observations, in-depth interviews and intensive archival research, this thesis analyzes the ways in which contentious journalists facilitate the formation of the counter-public sphere. It argues that the role of such journalists is manifested in three spontaneous processes: production of contentious space, production of contentious publics, and production of contentious community. Meanwhile, the contentious journalists bring the counter-public sphere into dialogue with the state power and the mainstream media through production and dissemination of contentious journalism outputs and organization of contentious actions. In such processes, contentious journalists become a mojor force in the democratization of Chinese society.
机译:人们常常认为中国没有公共领域。在中国,公众讨论和公共话语的现实与哈贝马斯主义理想相距甚远。但是,作为国家与私人之间的中间境界,公共领域的运作在不同的社会中经历了不同的历史时刻。像其他地方一样,中国现在和历史上都存在并存在着各种形式的公共领域。尤其是在21世纪,随着国家逐渐失去对社会的控制,围绕着社会生活的各个方面正在形成一个反公共领域,包括人们经常研究的环境主义,女权主义和艾滋病行动主义,以及相对较少研究的新闻业。在最近的十年中,所谓的“有争议的记者”在中国媒体和政治舞台上已成为一个重要的社会群体,而激进和另类的新闻业已成为教育反公众和动员的主要基础政治争论。本文是一个具体的案例研究,分析了在国家控制的裂隙中,当代中国的新闻兼行动主义反公共领域是如何形成的。具体来说,它着眼于以广州有争议的记者社区为基础的反公共领域的形成。它认为,三十年来的媒体改革极大地改变了中国媒体与国家之间的传统关系,从而导致了这类有争议的记者的崛起。就主流媒体经常充当官方公共领域的主要机构而言,当代中国社会中有争议的记者崛起的政治意义在于,它们促进了反公共领域的形成。本文利用人种学的观察,深入的采访和深入的档案研究,分析了有争议的记者促进反公共领域形成的方式。它认为,这种记者的作用体现在三个自发过程中:有争议的空间的产生,有争议的公众的产生和有争议的社区的产生。同时,有争议的记者通过生产和传播有争议的新闻产出和组织有争议的行动,使反公共领域与国家权力和主流媒体进行对话。在这样的过程中,有争议的记者成为中国社会民主化的主要力量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Haiyan.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Journalism.;Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 324 p.
  • 总页数 324
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号