首页> 外文学位 >The marketization of education in Hungary: Education and social mobility in theory and practice.
【24h】

The marketization of education in Hungary: Education and social mobility in theory and practice.

机译:匈牙利教育市场化:理论与实践中的教育与社会流动。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It is my argument that the reform of Hungarian higher education is subordinate to a neoliberal agenda involving the marketization of public services driven by the international financial community through the policies of the World Bank and the European Union. Specifically, the five most frequently cited goals of the reform of Hungarian higher education (the integration of state-run higher education institutions, increased institutional autonomy, increased mobility of students, faculty and graduates between nations, institutions and levels of education, the continued massification of higher education; and the implementation of Western quality assurance practices) serve one of two principal ends: the introduction of cost recovery mechanisms in the provision of social services and the transition to a knowledge-based economy (the former championed by the World Bank, the latter by the European Union). Lamentably, Hungarian policy makers seem more concerned with the interests of the international financial community than the well being of the Hungarian population. Consequently, the potential benefits of the restructuring of Hungarian higher education cannot be meaningfully evaluated without also considering the largely deleterious impact of the marketization of what was once considered a public service. Thus, there is an irreconcilable contradiction in the Hungarian government's ongoing campaign to win public support for reforms not clearly in the interest of the Hungarian population.
机译:我的论点是,匈牙利高等教育的改革属于新自由主义议程的一部分,该议程涉及国际金融界通过世界银行和欧盟政策推动的公共服务市场化。具体而言,匈牙利高等教育改革的五个最经常提及的目标(国立高等教育机构的整合,机构自治的增加,国家,机构和教育水平之间的学生,教师和毕业生的流动性增加,持续的大众化)高等教育;以及实施西方质量保证实践)有两个主要目的之一:在提供社会服务中引入成本回收机制以及向知识型经济过渡(前者由世界银行倡导,后者由欧洲联盟负责)。可悲的是,匈牙利的政策制定者似乎更关心国际金融社会的利益,而不是匈牙利人民的福祉。因此,如果不考虑以前被认为是公共服务的市场化的巨大有害影响,就无法对匈牙利高等教育结构调整的潜在利益进行有意义的评估。因此,匈牙利政府正在进行的争取公众支持的改革运动中存在着不可调和的矛盾,这显然不是为了匈牙利人民的利益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schelble, James Terence.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.$bCentral Eurasian Studies.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.$bCentral Eurasian Studies.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 327 p.
  • 总页数 327
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号