首页> 外文学位 >Students and online writing labs (OWLs): Challenges, learning strategies and attributes of high-quality OWLs.
【24h】

Students and online writing labs (OWLs): Challenges, learning strategies and attributes of high-quality OWLs.

机译:学生和在线写作实验室(OWL):挑战,学习策略和高质量OWL的属性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of the study was to examine the writing problems of collegiate students, the challenges they encountered when using an online writing lab (OWL) to address these writing problems and the learning strategies employed to address both challenges in the context of an OWL. Lastly, the study examined the attributes a high quality OWL from the perspective of students who use OWLs. The review of literature indicated a lack of published research on the writing challenges students bring to an OWL and their learning strategies as they address both writing challenges and challenges confronted using the OWL itself.;In order to gather the richest data possible, a qualitative research approach was used. Data for the study was collected via interviews using semi-structured open-ended questions and analyzed via constant comparison.;Students brought such writing challenges as using appropriate word usage and grammar, writing in a logical order, concerns about wandering off topic, addressing the assignment, using correct citation formats, finding information on writing resumes, and wanting feedback from a tutor: challenges considered common college writing problems as documented in the literature. This suggests students see OWLs as resources to address all their writing challenges.;Challenges students faced using an OWL to resolve writing problems included: finding the OWL; deciphering information in the OWL; needing more examples, needing more research support, and wishing for more attributes and content in the OWL. Other challenges using the OWL included not finding the information they sought; in part due to a related challenge of not using the OWL search engine, and having technical difficulties. Having a hard time with the online tutor's comments was also noted.;Students used the learning strategies of planning, monitoring comprehension, metacognition, elaboration, and evaluation. Use of prior knowledge emerged as a strategy to address both writing problems and the challenge of using an OWL.;Key quality attributes include the electronic handouts, goal setting assistance, interactive tutorials/quizzes, assistance with a variety of writing styles, hyperlinks to writing-related sites and online tutorial services.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究大学生的写作问题,他们在使用在线写作实验室(OWL)来解决这些写作问题时遇到的挑战以及在OWL的背景下用来应对这两个挑战的学习策略。最后,该研究从使用OWL的学生的角度检查了高质量OWL的属性。文献综述表明,对于学生面对OWL所面临的写作挑战以及他们在应对写作挑战和使用OWL本身所面临的挑战时所采用的学习策略,缺乏公开的研究;为了收集尽可能丰富的数据,需要进行定性研究方法被使用。这项研究的数据是通过半开放式问题通过访谈收集的,并通过不断的比较进行了分析。;学生面临着写作方面的挑战,例如使用适当的单词用法和语法,逻辑上的顺序书写,对偏离主题的担忧,解决作业,使用正确的引文格式,查找有关写作履历的信息以及希望获得导师的反馈:挑战被认为是文献中记录的常见大学写作问题。这表明学生将OWL视为解决所有写作挑战的资源。学生面临的使用OWL解决写作问题的挑战包括:找到OWL;发现OWL;解决OWL。在OWL中解密信息;需要更多示例,需要更多研究支持,并希望在OWL中具有更多属性和内容。使用OWL的其他挑战包括找不到所需的信息;部分原因是相关挑战:不使用OWL搜索引擎,并且存在技术困难。还注意到网上老师的评论很难。学生使用了计划,监视理解,元认知,阐述和评估的学习策略。使用先验知识已成为解决写作问题和使用OWL挑战的一种策略;关键质量属性包括电子讲义,目标设定帮助,交互式教程/测验,各种写作风格的帮助,写作超链接相关站点和在线教程服务。

著录项

  • 作者

    McGraw, William J.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Language Rhetoric and Composition.;Education Technology of.;Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 163 p.
  • 总页数 163
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号