【24h】

AERATION IMPROVEMENTS TO SAVE ENERGY

机译:节省能源的充气改进

获取原文

摘要

The City of San Jose at its San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant has embarked ona series of projects to reduce energy consumption and provide operational savings, and aerationsystem upgrading is one of the key projects. The plant was converted in 2000 from a coarsebubble, cross-roll in 2000 to fine bubble membrane tube diffusers, which produced significantsavings. In 2009 a second project was initiated to develop an even more cost effectivealternative using a greater number of diffusers in slightly different geometries. Off-gas testingwas performed to confirm aeration efficiency. An economic analysis was used to determine themost cost effective alternative. Upgrading the original year-2000 retrofit with diffusers havingmore active surface area provided a pay back of approximately one year. The economic analysisalso confirmed that the decision to upgrade the original coarse bubble system with fine bubblediffusers was sound and would provide a payback of 3 to 6 months using current costs. Onecounter-institutive result was the inadequacy of the original coarse bubble diffuser air piping.The in-tank headers were able to provide even air distribution for coarse bubble diffusers butwere unable to do so with fine pore diffusers, which operate at much lower air flow rate.Upgrading options are continuing and additional energy conservation activities will occur.
机译:圣何塞市圣何塞/圣塔克拉拉水污染控制厂已开展了一系列项目,以减少能源消耗并节省运营成本,而通风系统升级是重点项目之一。该工厂于2000年从2000年的粗泡沫,交叉辊转化为细泡沫膜管扩散器,从而节省了大量资金。在2009年,启动了第二个项目,以开发使用更多几何形状略有不同的扩散器的更具成本效益的替代方案。进行废气测试以确认曝气效率。使用经济分析来确定最具成本效益的替代方案。使用具有更大有效表面积的散流器升级最初的2000年改造,可以节省大约一年的投资。经济分析还证实,用细小气泡扩散器升级原始粗气泡系统的决定是合理的,并且使用当前成本可以收回3到6个月。一个反措施的结果是原始的粗气泡扩压器空气管道不足,罐内集管能够为粗气泡扩压器提供均匀的空气分配,但细孔扩压器却无法做到这一点,而细孔扩压器在低得多的空气流量下运行。升级方案仍在继续,还将开展更多的节能活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号