【24h】

Insights from Modeling the Dynamics of Process Improvement

机译:从过程改进动力学建模中获得的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Process improvement takes place in the context of ongoing work, so people usually face the dual pressure to produce output and to build capability. Repenning and Sterman's (2002) study of two process improvement initiatives developed a causal loop diagram characterizing first-order improvements which boost output from existing processes and second-order improvements which enhance the capability of underlying processes, but the study stopped short of building a simulating model. This paper starts from the feedback structure they present and constructs a system dynamics model that formalizes the critical interaction between first- and second-order improvements as options for governing production. Analytical results characterize the optimal tradeoff between working harder and working smarter. However, practitioners generally must manage this tradeoff lacking adequate knowledge of the parameter space to find the optimum. Results demonstrate tipping points in the dynamics of process improvement, identify perverse behaviors that are likely to thwart the good intentions of practitioners, and show how the feedback structure of process improvement presents challenges to agents facing the dual pressures to produce and improve. By moving from causal loops to a simulating model, the paper also provides an example of how formal modeling yields more nuanced understanding.
机译:流程改进是在正在进行的工作中进行的,因此人们通常会面临产生产出和建立能力的双重压力。 Repenning和Sterman(2002)对两个流程改进计划的研究建立了一个因果关系图,描绘了一阶改进以增强现有流程的输出,而二阶改进则增强了基础流程的功能,但是该研究没有建立一个模拟模型。本文从他们提出的反馈结构入手,并构建了一个系统动力学模型,该模型将一阶和二阶改进之间的关键相互作用正式化为支配生产的选项。分析结果表明了在更努力工作与更聪明工作之间的最佳权衡。但是,从业人员通常必须在缺乏足够的参数空间知识来找到最佳值的情况下进行权衡。结果证明了过程改进动态中的转折点,确定了可能阻碍从业者良好意愿的不良行为,并表明了过程改进的反馈结构如何对面临生产和改进双重压力的代理商提出挑战。通过从因果循环转移到模拟模型,本文还提供了一个示例,说明形式化建模如何产生更细微的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号