首页> 外文会议>Static and dynamic spinal implants: are we evaluating them appropriately?. >ASTM F2624-07-Evaluating an Alternate Fixture for Testing Extra Discal Motion Preserving Implants
【24h】

ASTM F2624-07-Evaluating an Alternate Fixture for Testing Extra Discal Motion Preserving Implants

机译:ASTM F2624-07-评估用于测试额外的椎间盘保留运动植入物的替代治具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

ASTM F2624-07 prescribes applying flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments to test and evaluate extra discal motion preserving implants (EDMPI). The standard provides a suggested laterally oriented construct (LOC) for conducting flexion/extension (FE) testing. The suggested construct does not have a fixed center of rotation (COR). An alternate set of fixtures to conduct FE testing using a vertically oriented construct (VOC) with a fixed COR is presented. Testing was conducted to quantify the loads applied to an EDMPI using both types of fixtures, quantify shear loading applied to the actuator, determine whether results are frequency dependent, and evaluate whether the fixtures can differentiate between EDMPI using a measure of displacement amplitude. A miniature load cell was mounted to both fixtures to quantify load applied to an EDMPI during testing at several different applied loads or torques and at two testing frequencies (2 Hz and 5 Hz). Lateral actuator shear was measured using a dial indicator. The load cell was replaced with cylindrical test specimens made of stainless steel, titanium, polyether ether ketone, or a polyethylene cable slipped inside a polyurethane tube, and the testing repeated. Results indicated that both fixtures generated similar tensile/compres-sive loads at an EDMPI. The LOC fixture generated more actuator shear than the VOC. Using a VOC fixture rather than the LOC suggested in ASTM F2624-07 in FE testing may be a reasonable alternative for certain types of devices.
机译:ASTM F2624-07规定施加屈曲/伸展,横向弯曲和轴向旋转力矩,以测试和评估额外的椎间盘保留运动植入物(EDMPI)。该标准提供了建议的侧向构造(LOC),用于进行屈曲/伸展(FE)测试。建议的构造没有固定的旋转中心(COR)。提出了另一套夹具,用于使用具有固定COR的垂直定向构造(VOC)进行FE测试。进行了测试,以量化使用这两种类型的夹具施加到EDMPI的载荷,量化施加到执行器的剪切载荷,确定结果是否与频率相关,并使用位移幅度的度量来评估夹具是否可以区分EDMPI。将一个微型测力传感器安装到两个夹具上,以量化在测试过程中以几种不同的施加载荷或扭矩以及两个测试频率(2 Hz和5 Hz)施加到EDMPI的载荷。使用百分表测量横向致动器剪切力。用不锈钢,钛,聚醚醚酮或在聚氨酯管内打滑的聚乙烯电缆制成的圆柱形试样代替称重传感器,然后重复测试。结果表明,两种夹具在EDMPI上均产生相似的拉伸/压缩载荷。 LOC夹具产生的致动器剪切力大于VOC。对于某些类型的设备,使用VOC夹具而不是ASTM F2624-07在FE测试中建议的LOC可能是一种合理的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号