首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 45th annual conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS 2001) >SYSTEMS CRACKS ARE WHERE THE LIGHT GETS IN: MODELS AND MEASURES OF SERVICE IN THE BENEFIT OF CONTEXT
【24h】

SYSTEMS CRACKS ARE WHERE THE LIGHT GETS IN: MODELS AND MEASURES OF SERVICE IN THE BENEFIT OF CONTEXT

机译:系统漏洞在何处:受益于上下文的服务模式和措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A paradox is emerging for those concerned about management theory andrnpractice. The paradox lies with the activities and products of organizationsrnbecoming more fluid while organizational structure and management modelsrnremained fixed. Managerial emphasis favor the more “solid” aspects ofrnorganizations while their leading edges become more “fluid.” Management lorernand principles continue to be taught, and practiced, as if what was remainsrntimeless. Management continues to base its decision-making on information fromrnstatistical and reductionistic analysis. The result is a noteworthy mismatchrnbetween the rate of change in the environmental and the human desire forrnconstancy. The mismatch is showing up on the surface of situations in what wernherein called “cracks.” Cracks can also be seen in the surfaces of organizations,rnproducts and customer bases.rnThe theory behind the paper comes from the early 1940s. Cracks point to systemrnforces that were not been reconciled within the limits of the system. “Crackage”rnmay also be a sign of systems reaching their limits. Herein the systems ofrninterest are social organizations and their management. The main interest thusrnbecomes management theory, where cracks appear where a principle appearsrninadequate, even humorous, in the face of an organizational challenge. Suchrncracks are more obvious with time. Using command and control strategies tornmanage internet information access and use is one example. Such cracks can bernseen as early indicators of larger problems looming for organizations. This pointrnwas at the center of a discussion held in the business systems interest grouprnsession of last year’s ISSS Conference. It was argued that radically differentrnforms and norms of management were needed. One metaphor proposed fromrnthat discussion was to find more “fluid” methods of management for dealing withrnincreasingly fluid entities and environments. This idea is used herein to describe
机译:对于那些关注管理理论和实践的人来说,悖论正在出现。悖论在于组织的活动和产品变得更加灵活,而组织结构和管理模型却保持固定。管理者强调组织的“更牢固”方面,而其前沿变得更“流畅”。继续教授和实践管理原则,好像那是永恒的。管理层继续基于来自统计和归约分析的信息进行决策。结果是环境变化率与人类渴望的恒定性之间存在明显的不匹配。这种不匹配现象在我们所谓的“裂缝”中浮出水面。在组织,产品和客户群的表面也可以看到裂缝。本文的理论来自1940年代初期。裂缝指向未在系统范围内协调的系统力。 “崩溃”也可能表明系统已达到极限。这里感兴趣的系统是社会组织及其管理。因此,主要的兴趣就变成了管理理论,即出现裂缝的地方,面对组织挑战,原则显得不足甚至幽默。随着时间的流逝,这种裂痕更加明显。使用命令和控制策略来管理互联网信息的访问和使用就是一个例子。可以将此类裂缝视为组织即将出现的更大问题的早期指标。这一点是去年ISSS会议的业务系统兴趣小组会议上讨论的中心。有人认为,需要根本不同的管理形式和规范。从讨论中提出的一个比喻是,该讨论是寻找更多“流动”的管理方法来应对不断变化的实体和环境。这个想法在这里用来描述

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号