【24h】

Lessons Learned from a 10 Year Industry-Wide DHI Consortium

机译:从一个10岁的行业范围的DHI联盟中汲取经验教训

获取原文

摘要

The effect the presence of oil and especially gas has on the seismic amplitude response in many geological settings can have a dramatic impact in risking prospects. Seismic amplitude anomalies that display direct hydrocarbon indicators (DHIs) have played a major role in oil and gas exploration since the early 1970s. Over the last 40 years there have been tremendous advances in seismic acquisition, processing, and inter-pretation, as well as, improvements in the methodology to identity and risk seismic amplitude anomalies. Even with the use of advanced seismic technology and well-equipped interpretation workstations, the interpretation of hydrocarbon induced seismic amplitude characteristics is not always easy or straightforward. In order to avoid costly mistakes, a systematic, consistent and thorough work process is necessary to risk exploration prospects with seismic amplitude anomalies that may be associated with hydrocarbons. The process should be broad enough to cover reservoirs in geological settings that range from unconsolidated to consolidated sands. Traditionally, most oil companies employ a set of geologic chance factors to determine the risk of exploration prospects (Fig. 1). Typically each major geologic chance factor category is risked and multiplied together to determine the overall risk of the prospect. How does the presence of seismic amplitudes interpreted as DHIs impact these geologic chance factors? Does an amplitude defined area mean there is a source rock? Does a high amplitude anomaly mean a reservoir is present? Interpreters should avoid this circular reasoning in that if a true DHI is present, all the geologic chance factors (not just one or two) are working and a petroleum system is present Therefore, the key to evaluating these prospects is to determine whether a seismic amplitude anomaly truly is a DHI. Not all seismic amplitude anomalies are DHIs. This requires a systematic and consistent process to evaluating seismic amplitude anomalies.
机译:在许多地质环境中对地震幅度响应的存在的影响可能对冒险的前景产生显着影响。显示直接碳氢化合物指标(DHIS)的地震振幅异常在20世纪70年代初以来,在石油和天然气勘探中发挥了重要作用。在过去的40年中,地震采集,加工和防伪性的巨大进步,以及对身份和风险地震幅度异常的方法的改进。即使利用先进地震技术和设备齐全的解释工作站,碳氢化合物诱导的地震幅度特性的解释并不总是容易或简单的。为了避免昂贵的错误,有必要的,系统,一致和彻底的工作过程对于可能与碳氢化合物相关的地震振幅异常进行勘探前景。该过程应足够宽,以覆盖地质环境中的储层,这些水库范围从未溶解在整合到固结的沙子。传统上,大多数石油公司雇用了一系列地质机会因素来确定勘探前景的风险(图1)。通常,每个主要的地质机会因子类别都有风险和乘以共同,以确定前景的整体风险。被解释为DHIS的地震振幅的存在如何影响这些地质机会因素?幅度定义的区域是否意味着有源摇滚乐?高振幅异常是否意味着存在储层?口译员应该避免这种循环推理,因为如果存在真正的DHI,则所有地质机会因素(不仅仅是一两个)就是工作,因此,评估这些前景的关键是确定地震幅度异常真正是迪施。并非所有地震振幅异常都是DHIS。这需要系统和一致的方法来评估地震振幅异常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号