首页> 外文会议>ASME joint rail conference >FURTHER RESEARCH INTO WHEEL RIM AXIAL RESIDUAL STRESS AND VERTICAL SPLIT RIM FAILURES
【24h】

FURTHER RESEARCH INTO WHEEL RIM AXIAL RESIDUAL STRESS AND VERTICAL SPLIT RIM FAILURES

机译:进一步研究车轮边缘轴向残余应力和垂直分裂轮辋故障

获取原文

摘要

Recent work using x-ray diffraction techniques has shown that the axial residual stress pattern within the railroad wheel rim is significantly different for as-manufactured AAR Class C wheels vs. AAR Class C wheels that have failed due to a vertical split rim (VSR), and non-failed AAR Class C wheels that have been operating in service. VSRs almost always begin at areas of tread damage, resulting from shelling or spalling, and cracking propagates into the rim section under load. At the locations tested, the as-manufactured wheels have a relatively "flat" axial residual stress profile, compressive but near neutral, caused by the rim quenching operation, while wheels that have been in service have a layer of high axial compressive stress at the tread surface, and a balancing zone of axial tensile stress underneath. The magnitude and direction of this tensile stress is consistent with the crack propagation of a VSR failure. When cracks from the tread surface propagate into this sub-surface axial tensile zone, a VSR can occur under sufficient additional service loading, such as loads caused by in-service wheel/rail impacts from tread damage. Further, softer Class U wheels, removed from service and tested, were found to have a balancing axial tensile stress layer that is deeper below the tread surface than that found in used Class C wheels.This paper describes further efforts to characterize the axial residual stress present in failed VSR and used Class C wheels. Axial residual stress results are obtained near the initiation point of several VSR wheels using x-ray diffraction. Sub-surface axial residual stress patterns are also determined at points of high out-of-roundness for a group of wheels that were tested for TIR (total indicated runout) on the tread surface. Residual stress data and a photo are presented for a wheel rim slice containing a second VSR crack. Additionally, wheel rim ultrasonic testing data, collected by the wheel manufacturer when the wheels were new, are discussed for wheels that have failed due to VSRs and these data are compared to ultrasonic data for non-VSR wheels. Chemistry data are also compared. These data show that the driving force for VSRs is axial residual tensile stress, not a material cleanliness issue.
机译:使用X射线衍射技术的最新作品表明,由于垂直分开边缘(VSR),导致的AAR Class C车轮与AAR Class C车轮的轴向残余应力图案显着不同,并在服务中运营的非失败的AAR类C轮子。 VSR几乎总是在胎面损坏区域开始,由炮击或剥落产生,并且破裂传播到负载下的边缘部分。在测试的位置处,由制造的轮子具有相对“平坦的”轴向残余应力曲线,压缩但接近中性,由边缘淬火操作引起,而已经在使用的轮子具有一层高轴压压力胎面表面,以及下面的轴向拉伸应力的平衡区域。这种拉伸应力的幅度和方向与VSR失败的裂纹传播一致。当来自胎面表面的裂缝传播到该副表面轴向拉伸区中时,VSR可以在足够的额外使用负载下发生,例如由胎面损坏的胎轮/导轨冲击引起的负载。此外,发现从使用和测试中除去的更软的U轮子具有平衡的轴向拉伸应力层,该轴向拉伸应力层在胎面表面下方更深,而不是在使用的C类车轮中发现。本文介绍了表征轴向残余应力的进一步努力存在于失败的VSR和使用C类轮上。使用X射线衍射在几个VSR轮的起始点附近获得轴向残余应力结果。副表面轴向残余应力图案也在高圆形的光度下确定用于胎面表面上的TIR(总指示的跳动)的一组轮子的高圆形。呈现含有第二VSR裂缝的车轮边缘切片的残余应力数据和照片。另外,当轮子是新的,由车轮制造商收集的轮式超声波测试数据,当由于VSRS而失败的车轮被讨论,并且这些数据与非VSR轮子的超声数据进行比较。化学数据也比较。这些数据表明,VSRS的驱动力是轴向残留的拉伸应力,而不是材料清洁度问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号