首页> 外文会议>International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering >Field Comparison of Gas-Powered vs. Battery-Powered Equipment for Grounds Maintenance - Hedge Trimming Operations
【24h】

Field Comparison of Gas-Powered vs. Battery-Powered Equipment for Grounds Maintenance - Hedge Trimming Operations

机译:用于地面维护的气体动力设备和电池动力设备的现场比较-绿篱修剪操作

获取原文

摘要

American landscaping workers use a variety of noise-producing equipment and are at a high-risk for hearing loss. Although an effective control strategy is to replace noisy equipment with quieter alternatives, the most common method of hearing loss prevention in the United States is the use of hearing protectors. This reliance on hearing protectors often stems from lack of enforced regulations and the absence of product noise labels. However, one company has successfully implemented a buy quiet program for the task of hedge trimming. This presentation summarizes a field comparison of workers' noise exposure for two hedge-trimming crews: 1) one using gas-powered equipment and 2) the other using battery-powered equipment. Dosimetry and sound level measurements show that the crew using battery-powered equipment had significantly lower noise exposures than the crew using gasoline-powered versions. Furthermore, the management of this hedge-trimming crew provided researchers with information regarding evaluating the feasibility of switching over to battery-powered equipment and their systematic approach to buying quieter equipment.
机译:美国园林绿化工人使用各种产生噪音的设备,听力损失的风险很高。尽管有效的控制策略是用更安静的替代品代替嘈杂的设备,但在美国,预防听力损失的最常见方法是使用听力保护器。这种对听力保护器的依赖通常是由于缺乏强制性法规和缺乏产品噪音标签。但是,一家公司已成功实施了“安静购买”计划,以完成绿篱修剪任务。本演讲总结了对两名树篱修剪机工人的工人噪声暴露情况的现场比较:1)一个使用汽油动力设备,而2)另一个使用电池动力设备。剂量学和声级测量表明,使用电池供电设备的机组人员的噪音暴露要明显低于使用汽油动力设备的机组。此外,这名修剪树篱的工作人员的管理人员还为研究人员提供了有关评估转换为电池供电设备的可行性以及他们购买安静设备的系统方法的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号