首页> 外文会议>International conference on applications of optics and photonics >Clinical performance of an objective methodology to categorize tear film lipid layer patterns
【24h】

Clinical performance of an objective methodology to categorize tear film lipid layer patterns

机译:泪膜脂质层模式分类的客观方法的临床表现

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: To validate the performance of a new objective application designated iDEAS (Dry Eye Assessment System) to categorize different zones of lipid layer patterns (LLPs) in one image. Material and methods: Using the Tearscope-plus and a digital camera attached to a slit-lamp, 50 images were captured and analyzed by 4 experienced optometrists. In each image the observers outlined tear film zones that they clearly identified as a specific LLP. Further, the categorization made by the 4 optometrists (called observer 1, 2, 3 and 4) was compared with the automatic system included in iDEAS (5th observer). Results: In general, observer 3 classified worse than all observers (observers 1, 2, 4 and automatic application, Wilcoxon test, p<0.05). The automatic system behaved similar to the remaining three observers (observer 1, 2 and 4) showing differences only for Open meshwork LLP when comparing with observer 4 (Wilcoxon test, p=0.02). For the remaining two observers (observer 1 and 2) there was not found statistical differences (Wilcoxon test, p>0.05) Furthermore, we obtained a set of photographs per LLP category for which all optometrists showed agreement by using the new tool. After examining them, we detected the more characteristic features for each LLP to enhance the description of the patterns implemented by Guillon. Conclusions: The automatic application included in the iDEAS framework is able to provide zones similar to the annotations made by experienced optometrists. Thus, the manual process done by experts can be automated with the benefits of being unaffected by subjective factors.
机译:目的:为了验证名为iDEAS(干眼评估系统)的新客观应用程序的性能,该应用程序可以在一幅图像中对脂质层模式(LLP)的不同区域进行分类。材料和方法:使用Tearscope-plus和连接在裂隙灯上的数码相机,捕获了50张图像,并由4位经验丰富的验光师进行了分析。观察者在每幅图像中都概述了泪膜区域,他们清楚地将其识别为特定的LLP。此外,将4位验光师(称为观察者1、2、3和4)所做的分类与iDEAS中包含的自动系统(第五观察者)进行了比较。结果:通常,观察者3的分类要比所有观察者差(观察者1、2、4和自动应用程序,Wilcoxon检验,p <0.05)。自动系统的行为类似于其余三个观察者(观察者1、2和4),与观察者4相比,仅开放网格LLP有所不同(Wilcoxon测试,p = 0.02)。对于其余两个观察者(观察者1和2),没有发现统计学差异(Wilcoxon检验,p> 0.05)。此外,我们使用新工具为每个LLP类别获得了一组照片,所有验光师对此都表示同意。在检查了它们之后,我们检测到每个LLP的更多特征,以增强对Guillon实现的模式的描述。结论:iDEAS框架中包含的自动应用程序能够提供与经验丰富的验光师所做的注释相似的区域。因此,专家完成的手动过程可以自动化,而不受主观因素的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号