首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications >Comparison of methods of fractal texture extraction for high-resolution remotely sensed images
【24h】

Comparison of methods of fractal texture extraction for high-resolution remotely sensed images

机译:高分辨率传感图像分形纹理提取方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Till now, there were several methods of fractal texture extraction developed for high-resolution remotely sensed images: triangular prism, fractal Brownian motion, DBC (different box-counting) and multi-fractal. However, one proper method should be selected in application. Upon that, in the paper, taking QuickBird image as example, based on a rather entire classification system founded for the image, fractal dimensions and correlative parameter were utilized to analyze features of those methods; mean, variance and computation time were utilized to compare difference of them. Then several conclusions were drawn through the experiment: fractal texture could be an effective feature to distinguish ground objects; among those methods, triangular prism couldn't do well on ground objects' distinguishing, FBM wasn't accurate (without no-scale part), but DBC and multi-fractal represented better on distinguishing ground objects and computing efficiency.
机译:到目前为止,有几种分形纹理提取方法为高分辨率遥感图像开发:三角形棱镜,分形布朗运动,DBC(不同盒子计数)和多分形。但是,应在应用中选择一个正确的方法。在此之后,在纸张中以QuickBird图像为例,基于用于图像的相当整个分类系统,分形尺寸和相关参数用于分析这些方法的特征;使用平均值,方差和计算时间来比较它们的差异。然后通过实验绘制了几个结论:分形纹理可能是区分地对象的有效特征;在这些方法中,三角形棱镜在地面物体'区分中,FBM不准确(没有没有尺度部分),但DBC和多分形更好地表示区分地面对象和计算效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号