首页> 外文会议>COTA international conference of transportation professionals >Pricing Policy between Container Terminals with Different Capital Natures
【24h】

Pricing Policy between Container Terminals with Different Capital Natures

机译:不同资本自然的集装箱码头之间的定价政策

获取原文

摘要

Since the late 1980s and early 1990s, many countries gradually started the reforms of port policy. Comparing with other countries which are on the same boat, the regulatory reforms of the Chinese port system was on the process of deregulation of foreign investment which means that there were more sectors allowed to be invested, like port sector, Sino-foreign joint venture, even wholly foreign-owned terminal. Nowadays, China has formed different capital natures of container terminals, such as the state investment, foreign investment, bank loans, self-raised funds, and IPO. This study presents an analysis of the pricing policy between two container terminals using a game theoretical model of two-stage non-cooperative. Our main finding is that the pricing policy adopted by the container terminal depending on its capital nature, and the Nash equilibrium is for both container terminals to adopt the not price-matching policy or foreign investment terminal; to adopt the price-matching policy while state investment terminal; to adopt the not price-matching policy.
机译:自20世纪80年代后期和20世纪90年代初,许多国家逐步开始了港口政策的改革。与同一船上的其他国家进行比较,中国港口系统的监管改革是对外商投资放松管制的过程,意味着允许投资更多的部门,如港口,中外合资企业,甚至完全是外资终端。如今,中国已经形成了集装箱码头的不同资本意识,如国家投资,外商投资,银行贷款,自筹资金和IPO。本研究介绍了使用两级非合作的游戏理论模型对两个集装箱码头之间的定价政策分析。我们的主要观点是,集装箱码头根据其资本性质采用的定价政策,纳什均衡是为集装箱码头采用而非价格匹配的政策或外国投资终端采用;在国家投资终端采用价格匹配政策;采纳不比价格匹配的政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号