首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management >Protection of safeguards sensitive information: the tension between the need to know and the need to get the job done.
【24h】

Protection of safeguards sensitive information: the tension between the need to know and the need to get the job done.

机译:保护保障敏感信息:需要了解所需的紧张关系,需要完成工作。

获取原文

摘要

The nuclear non-proliferation safeguards system is a field in which the various agencies involved have to walk a fine line between a range of competing priorities. Safeguards are best achieved through transparency yet, paradoxically, can only be achieved if the relevant information is afforded the highest possible level of protection. Tensions of this type arise at every level of safeguards. The resource costs of IAEA inspection planning would be greatly reduced if such plans could be made in full cooperation with the member states to ensure optimum use of resources by both the inspectorate and the member state. Unfortunately such openness and transparency would provide any potential diverter with sufficient time to defeat many of the IAEA's containment and surveillance measures and to conceal a wide range of possible diversions. Maximising inspection resource usage efficiency in this way would potentially result in an unacceptable loss of safeguards effectiveness The technical aspects of the process of evaluating safeguards relevant information about states would be improved if the IAEA could draw freely upon the technical expertise of the member states in order to evaluate the information, but that would require giving third parties access to safeguards sensitive information and would be unacceptable to many member states. Improving the efficiency of information analysis in this way would lead to heated discussions at the IAEA Board of Governors and potentially result in loss of access to information by the IAEA. Within the IAEA itself there is a wide range of expertise. Allowing widespread access to safeguards relevant information within the Secretariat would improve the situational awareness of professional staff and provide opportunities for synergies between work in different areas, but maintenance of such a free-flowing information environment would compete with the 'need to know principle' - one of the keystones of information security. How can the IAEA balance the need to know against the need to do the job effectively? This paper will explore these tensions and suggest ways in which the unavoidable tension might be managed.
机译:核不扩散保障制度是一个领域,其中各种机构必须在一系列竞争优先事项之间行走细线。通过透明度最佳地实现保障措施,矛盾的是,只有在有关信息获得最高水平的保护程度,才能实现。在每个级别的保障措施中都会出现这种情况的紧张局势。如果可以与会员国全面合作,可以大大减少国际原子组织检验规划的资源成本,以确保监督者和成员国的最佳利用资源。不幸的是,这种开放和透明度将提供任何潜在的分流者,足够的时间来破坏许多IAEA的遏制和监测措施,并掩盖各种可能的流动。以这种方式最大化检验资源使用效率可能导致保障措施的不可接受的损失,如果原子能机构可以在成员国的技术专业知识下自由地绘制成员国的技术专业知识,则会改善评估保障的过程的技术方面为了评估信息,但这需要提供第三方访问保护敏感信息,并且对许多会员国是不可接受的。以这种方式提高信息分析效率会导致在原子能机构委员会委员会的讨论,并可能导致原子能机构丧失信息获取。在原子能机构本身内部有广泛的专业知识。允许广泛的访问秘书处内保护有关信息将提高专业人员的情境意识,并为不同领域的工作之间的协同作用提供协同作用,但维护这种自由流动的信息环境将与“需要了解原则”竞争 - 信息安全的关键词之一。原子能机构如何平衡需要了解有效地完成工作的必要性?本文将探讨这些紧张局势,并建议可能管理不可避免的张力的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号