Cold rolled Zn-1.1%A1, Ti and Cu were annealed in a direct-current magnetic field with strength of 15.4 and 25.5 MA/m. For comparison the samples from the same metals were annealed out of the field. The textures in Zn-1.1%A1 and Ti were characterized by the two 0002 components tilted at ±15-20° about the transverse and at ±30° about the rolling direction, respectively. Treatment in the field results in a significant difference between texture peak components when the samples of Ti are tilted at +30 or -30° to the field direction about the rolling direction and samples of Zn-1.1%A1 are tilted at +19 or -19° about the transverse direction. The microhardness measurements in Ti and Cu reveal no effect of the field at the initial stages of recrystallization. A small difference in microhardness after annealing with and without field has been observed at the end of recrystallization and at the beginning of grain growth. Higher microhardness has been found after treatment in the field. The observed effects are ascribed to the difference in magnetic free energy of different grains due to the difference in their orientations or dislocation densities.
展开▼
机译：在直流磁场中以15.4和25.5 MA / m的强度对冷轧Zn-1.1％Al，Ti和Cu进行退火。为了进行比较，将相同金属的样品退火到野外。 Zn-1.1％A1和Ti中的织构的特征是两个0002分量分别围绕横向倾斜±15-20°和围绕轧制方向倾斜±30°。当Ti样品围绕轧制方向相对于磁场方向以+30或-30°倾斜并且Zn-1.1％A1样品以+19或-倾斜时，野外处理导致织构峰分量之间存在显着差异。大约横向19°。 Ti和Cu中的显微硬度测量表明在再结晶的初始阶段该场没有影响。在再结晶结束时和晶粒生长开始时，观察到有场退火和无场退火后显微硬度的微小差异。经现场处理后发现更高的显微硬度。观察到的效果归因于不同晶粒的磁自由能的差异，这归因于其取向或位错密度的差异。
展开▼
