【24h】

How do bacteria interact with minerals?

机译:细菌如何与矿物质相互作用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the last thirty-five years there has been a debate concerning the interaction of iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and sulfide minerals. Two basic positions are held. The proponents of the direct mechanism argue that the bacteria possess a specific biological mechanism to degrade the mineral and thereby gain energy directly from the sulfide mineral. On the other hand, the proponents of the indirect mechanism argue that it is the ferric ions in solution that dissolve the mineral, and the bacteria gain their energy requirements from regenerating the ferric ions. The indirect mechanism undoubtedly occurs, but proponents of the direct mechanism argue that it is not the dominant route. In other words, the debate hinges on the kinetics of each of these possible paths. The evidence presented in the published literature both for and against each of these mechanisms has been critically examined. Arguments based on stoichiometry, bacterial attachment or observations of the mineral surface cannot resolve this debate. Since the critical factor is the kinetics of each proposed path, only kinetic studies can resolve the debate. Based on the evidence of the kinetic studies that were performed, a resolution to the debate is suggested.
机译:在过去的三十五年里,关于铁和硫的氧化细菌与硫化物矿物之间相互作用的争论一直存在。担任两个基本职务。直接机制的支持者认为,细菌具有特定的生物机制来降解矿物,从而直接从硫化矿物中获取能量。另一方面,间接机理的支持者认为,溶解矿物质的是溶液中的铁离子,细菌通过再生铁离子获得了能量需求。间接机制无疑会发生,但是直接机制的支持者认为这不是主导途径。换句话说,辩论取决于这些可能路径中每一个的动力学。已经对公开发表的文献中对每种机制的支持和反对提出的证据进行了严格审查。基于化学计量,细菌附着或矿物表面观察的论点无法解决这一争论。由于关键因素是每种提议路径的动力学,因此只有动力学研究才能解决争论。根据进行的动力学研究的证据,提出了解决该争论的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号