首页> 外文会议>Image Processing pt.3; Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging; vol.7 no.30 >Measurement of colonic polyp size from virtual colonoscopy studies: Comparison of manual and automated methods
【24h】

Measurement of colonic polyp size from virtual colonoscopy studies: Comparison of manual and automated methods

机译:通过虚拟结肠镜检查研究测量结肠息肉大小:手动和自动方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Polyp size is an important feature descriptor for clinical classification and follow-up decision making in CT colonography. Currently, polyp size is measured from computed tomography (CT) studies manually as the single largest dimension of the polyp head, excluding the stalk if present, in either multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) or three-dimensional (3D) views. Manual measurements are subject to intra- and inter-reader variation, and can be time-consuming. Automated polyp segmentation and size measurement can reduce the variability and speed up the process. In this study, an automated polyp size measurement technique is developed. Using this technique, the polyp is segmented from the attached healthy tissue using a novel, model-based approach. The largest diameter of the segmented polyp is measured in axial, sagitttal and coronal MPR views. An expert radiologist identified 48 polyps from either supine or prone views of 52 cases of the Walter-Reed virtual colonoscopy database. Automated polyp size measurements were carried out and compared with the manual ones. For comparison, three different statistical methods were used: overall agreement using chance-corrected kappa indices; the mean absolute differences; and Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Manual and automated measurements show good agreement both in 2D and 3D views.
机译:息肉大小是CT结肠造影中临床分类和随访决策的重要特征描述符。当前,息肉大小是通过计算机断层扫描(CT)研究以多平面重建(MPR)或三维(3D)视角手动测量的,作为息肉头部的最大最大尺寸(不包括茎)。手动测量会因阅读器内部和阅读器之间的差异而变化,并且可能很耗时。自动化的息肉分割和大小测量可以减少变异性并加快过程。在这项研究中,开发了一种自动息肉大小测量技术。使用这种技术,可以使用基于模型的新颖方法从附着的健康组织中分离出息肉。分段息肉的最大直径在轴向,矢状和冠状MPR视野中测量。一位放射线专家从52例Walter-Reed虚拟结肠镜检查数据库的仰卧位或俯卧位中识别出48个息肉。进行了自动息肉大小测量,并与手动进行比较。为了进行比较,使用了三种不同的统计方法:使用机会校正的kappa指数的总体一致性;平均绝对差;以及Bland-Altman的协议限制。手动和自动测量在2D和3D视图中均显示出良好的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号