首页> 外文会议>Image Processing pt.3; Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging; vol.7 no.30 >Improving computer-aided diagnosis of interstitial disease in chest radiographs by combining one-class and two-class classifiers
【24h】

Improving computer-aided diagnosis of interstitial disease in chest radiographs by combining one-class and two-class classifiers

机译:通过结合一类和两类分类器来改善计算机辅助胸部X光片间质疾病的诊断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we compare and combine two distinct pattern classification approaches to the automated detection of regions with interstitial abnormalities in frontal chest radiographs. Standard two-class classifiers and recently developed one-class classifiers are considered. The one-class problem is to find the best model of the normal class and reject all objects that don't fit the model of normality. This one-class methodology was developed to deal with poorly balanced classes, and it uses only objects from a well-sampled class for training. This may be an advantageous approach in medical applications, where normal examples are easier to obtain than abnormal cases. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate classification performance by the different methods as a function of the number of abnormal cases available for training. Various two-class classifiers performed excellently in case that enough abnormal examples were available (area under ROC curve A_z = 0.985 for a linear discriminant classifier). The one-class approach gave worse result when used stand-alone (A_z = 0.88 for Gaussian data description) but the combination of both approaches, using a mean combining classifier resulted in better performance when only few abnormal samples were available (average A_z = 0.94 for the combination and A_z = 0.91 for the stand-alone linear discriminant in the same set-up). This indicates that computer-aided diagnosis schemes may benefit from using a combination of two-class and one-class approaches when only few abnormal samples are available.
机译:在本文中,我们比较并组合了两种不同的模式分类方法,以自动检测额胸片中具有间隙异常的区域。考虑了标准的两类分类器和最近开发的一类分类器。一类问题是找到正常类的最佳模型,并拒绝所有不符合正常模型的对象。开发这种一类方法论是为了处理平衡性差的类,并且仅使用采样良好的类中的对象进行训练。这在医学应用中可能是一种有利的方法,在该医学应用中,正常示例比异常情况更容易获得。我们使用接收器工作特征(ROC)分析,通过可用于训练的异常案例数量的函数,通过不同的方法评估分类性能。在有足够多的异常示例可用的情况下(对于线性判别式分类器,ROC曲线A_z = 0.985下的面积),各种二级分类器的性能都很好。单机方法单独使用时效果较差(对于高斯数据描述,A_z = 0.88),但是当只有很少的异常样本可用时,使用均值合并分类器的两种方法的组合会带来更好的性能(平均A_z = 0.94)对于组合,对于同一设置中的独立线性判别式,A_z = 0.91)。这表明当只有很少的异常样本可用时,计算机辅助诊断方案可能会受益于使用两类方法和一类方法的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号