首页> 外文会议>ICO20: Illumination, Radiation, and Color Technologies >Recent Progress in Computing Weighting Tables for Calculating CIE Tristimulus Values
【24h】

Recent Progress in Computing Weighting Tables for Calculating CIE Tristimulus Values

机译:计算CIE三刺激值的加权表的最新进展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In industrial practice, it is often required that weighting tables were prepared in advance and tristimulus values can then be directly computed using summation of the products of the weights and measured reflectance values. The CIE has never provided precise procedure to calculate the weighting tables, and various discrepant methods have been used. Hence it is possible to obtain significantly different tristimulus values from the same set of spectral data. In order to overcome this problem, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM Intl.) has published two sets of weighting tables known as Table 5 and Table 6 respectively. Each set includes 36 weighting tables covering 9 illuminants and two standard colorimetric observers at two wavelength intervals (10-nm and 20-nm). The weighting tables of Table 5 must be used with the reflectance corrected using the Stearns and Stearns (SS) method, and weighting tables of Table 6 must be used with the measured reflectance values without the SS correction. In practice, the illuminant used may be different from the CIE standard illuminants and users have to prepare their own weighting tables corresponding to the illuminant actually used. ASTM Intl. E2022-99 provided a standard calculation method to generate weighting tables of Table 5 for a non-standard illuminant. No standard procedure is given to calculate weighting tables of Table 6 since it consisted of Venable and Steams correction weights, and the Venable optimum weight is computed by an iterative procedure. In this artical, we will report some recent progress in generating weighting tables; compare the performances among the weighting tables such as ASTM Intl. Tables of Table 5 and Table 6, Optimum weighting tables, Least Square weighting tables, and Direct selection tables; quantify the possible colorimetric errors for each of the tables; and finally recommend for standardization of a method for generating weighting tables.
机译:在工业实践中,通常需要预先准备权重表,然后可以使用权重与测得的反射率值之和直接计算三刺激值。 CIE从未提供过精确的程序来计算权重表,并且已经使用了各种不同的方法。因此,有可能从同一组光谱数据中获得明显不同的三刺激值。为了克服这个问题,美国材料试验学会(ASTM Intl。)发布了两组加权表,分别称为表5和表6。每套包括36个加权表,分别覆盖9个光源和两个标准色度观测器,两个波长间隔(10-nm和20-nm)。必须将表5的权重表与使用Stearns and Stearns(SS)方法校正的反射率一起使用,并且将表6的权重表与未经SS校正的测得的反射率值一起使用。在实践中,所使用的光源可能与CIE标准光源不同,并且用户必须准备自己的与实际使用的光源相对应的权重表。 ASTM国际E2022-99提供了一种标准计算方法,可以为非标准光源生成表5的权重表。由于表6由Venable和Steams校正权重组成,因此没有给出标准程序来计算表6的权重表,并且通过迭代程序来计算Venable最佳权重。在本文中,我们将报告在生成加权表方面的最新进展;比较加权表(例如ASTM Intl)之间的性能。表5和表6的表,最佳加权表,最小二乘加权表和直接选择表;量化每个表格可能的比色误差;最后建议标准化生成权重表的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号