Cost comparison analysis of ANR compared to conventional reforestation Bagong Pagasa Foundation

摘要

Project experience clearly validates that forest restoration can be accomplished at lower costs with ANR than via conventional reforestation. Thus, if the principal objectives of forest restoration are rehabilitation of vegetative cover on watersheds and wildlife habitats, ANR is a logical choice. The principal reasons for lower costs are the elimination of expenses for seedlings, digging of planting holes, planting and replanting. ANR takes full advantage of existing regeneration on site including seedlings of pioneer tree species and woody brush.