首页> 外文会议>American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME) Turbo Expo vol.6; 20040614-17; Vienna(AT) >Rotordynamic Coefficients for a Tooth-on-Stator Labyrinth Seal at 70 bar Supply Pressures- Measurements Versus Theory and Comparisons to a Hole-Pattern Stator Seal
【24h】

Rotordynamic Coefficients for a Tooth-on-Stator Labyrinth Seal at 70 bar Supply Pressures- Measurements Versus Theory and Comparisons to a Hole-Pattern Stator Seal

机译:静压式迷宫式密封在70 bar供气压力下的转子动力学系数-测量值与理论值的比较以及与孔型定子密封件的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Rotordynamic and leakage coefficients are presented for a labyrinth seal that was tested at a supply pressure of 70 bar-a and speeds up to 20200 rpm. Tests were conducted at clearances of 0.1mm and 0.2mm, pressure ratios of 0.10, 0.31 and 0.52, and three pre-swirls ratios. Comparisons are made between test data and predictions from one-control-volume and two-control-volume bulk-flow models. Generally, theoretical predictions agree poorly with the test results, with the one-control volume model giving better predictions. The one-control-volume model provides a conservative prediction for effective damping; i.e., this parameter is underestimated. Both models under predict leakage rates. Comparisons are also made between rotordynamic coefficients of labyrinth and hole-pattern seals.
机译:给出了迷宫式密封的转子动力学系数和泄漏系数,该密封系数在70 bar-a的供应压力下进行了测试,转速高达20200 rpm。在间隙为0.1mm和0.2mm,压力比为0.10、0.31和0.52以及三个预旋流比的条件下进行测试。在测试数据与一控制量和两控制量体积流量模型的预测之间进行比较。通常,理论预测与测试结果的一致性很差,而单控制体积模型可以提供更好的预测。单控制量模型为有效阻尼提供了保守的预测。即,该参数被低估了。两种模型都可以预测泄漏率。迷宫式和孔型密封的转子动力学系数也进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号