首页> 外文会议>2014 water quality technology conference : The premier conference for water quality professionals around the world >Disinfection By-Product Challenges Associated with Converting from Chloramination to Free Chlorine Disinfection
【24h】

Disinfection By-Product Challenges Associated with Converting from Chloramination to Free Chlorine Disinfection

机译:从氯化转化为游离氯消毒相关的消毒副产品挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) operates a surface water treatment plant with an overall designrncapacity of 22.5 mgd. The treatment train consists of presedimentation, coagulation (alum), flocculation,rnsedimentation, intermediate ozonation for primary disinfection, chlorine addition on top of the filters forrnmanganese oxidation and chloramination for secondary disinfection. The water supply source is the TarrnRiver. Tar River water generally contains high TOC, color and manganese concentrations. Prior to plantrnexpansion in 2004, including the addition of ozone, primary and secondary disinfection was accomplishedrnusing free chlorine. The switch to chloramines was made to achieve compliance with the Stage 1 andrnStage 2 Disinfectant/Disinfection By-Product Rule (D/DBPR). In 2012, GUC conducted a water treatmentrnplant master planning effort to identify upgrade and expansion elements required for a 50-year planningrnperiod. A component of this analysis was to evaluate the feasibility of converting back to free chlorinernsecondary disinfection while still maintaining compliance with the Stage 2 D/DBPR. This change wasrnconsidered due to concerns related to the overall biological stability of the treated water and occurrencernof elevated HPC counts in the distribution system. Concerns related to potential future regulation ofrnorgano-nitrogen DBPs also drove the decision to evaluate free chlorine as a secondary disinfectant. Thisrnpresentation will focus on alternatives evaluated to achieve DBP compliance with free chlorinerndisinfection. The evaluation considered several options to achieve disinfection compliance including 1)rnoptimization of the coagulation process, 2) alternative oxidants such as chlorine dioxide, 3) powderedrnactivated carbon addition, 4) advanced TOC removal processes including MIEX and GAC, and 5)rnozone/biofiltration. The relative performance of each option and the projected capital and operating costsrnassociated with each option will also be presented.
机译:格林维尔公用事业委员会(GUC)运营的地表水处理厂的总设计能力为22.5 mgd。处理流程包括沉淀,凝结(沉淀),絮凝,沉淀,初次消毒的中间臭氧处理,在过滤器顶部添加氯以进行锰氧化和氯化以进行二次消毒。供水源是塔恩河。焦油河水中的总有机碳,色素和锰含量普遍较高。在2004年进行工厂扩建(包括添加臭氧)之前,使用游离氯完成了一次和二次消毒。改用氯胺以达到第1阶段和第2阶段消毒剂/消毒副产物规则(D / DBPR)的要求。 2012年,GUC进行了水处理厂总体规划工作,以确定50年规划期所需的升级和扩展要素。该分析的一个组成部分是评估转换为游离氯二次消毒的可行性,同时仍保持符合第2阶段D / DBPR的要求。考虑到与处理后的水的整体生物学稳定性有关的问题,以及分配系统中HPC计数升高的情况,因此未考虑此更改。与未来对有机氮DBPs的潜在监管有关的担忧也促使人们决定评估游离氯作为次要消毒剂。本演讲将重点介绍为实现DBP符合游离氯消毒要求而评估的替代方案。该评估考虑了实现消毒合规性的几种选择,包括1)凝结工艺的最优化,2)替代氧化剂(如二氧化氯),3)粉末状活性碳的添加,4)先进的TOC去除工艺(包括MIEX和GAC)和5)zone /生物滤池。还将显示每个选项的相对性能以及与每个选项相关的预计资本和运营成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号